The John Moore Show, May 20, 2025 Hour 2

…”There are many claims that Russia has fared better than most big countries during this deadly era of fake pandemics and experimental mandated shots. And so I traveled to Russia last December to see for myself. What I learned was that this is true, but the government is not to credit for this. While elements of the Russian Federation do protect and preserve the Russian people and their culture, the evidence shows that they were administering the same deadly shots as we’ve seen in the West.
The number of deaths in Russia during the roll-out of their vaccines exceeded 2.4 million people, making it the worst year of deaths since 1945. Data shows a correlation between vaccination and the increase in morbidity and mortality. And the head of the Russian ministry of health urged pregnant women to get the shot, saying it will contribute to a more comfortable and safe pregnancy…”

https://www.brighteon.com/d2040238-47bd-43e2-82ad-b0e7483a0be2

russia covid 19 vaccine sputnik v and astrazeneca — Yandex:found 2 million results
https://yandex.com/search/?text=russia+covid+19+vaccine+sputnik+v+and+astrazeneca

Translate.Google.com
Latin to English: a stra ze neca = a road to death

Charlie brings up the Sputnik V vaccine (timestamp 55:50) from Russia, stating that it is not an mRNA vaccine and that it was “a regular type vaccine” “similar to the Jonson & Johnson” ” but it was not an mRNA type”.
A “regular” vaccine contains a part of the virus to which the body makes antibodies. In this case, a Spike protein which was used in one or more vaccines but this method may have had a higher incidence of immediate negative effects, and this was eliminated or suppressed in its use.

He was, it appears, ignorant of the technology of the Sputnik V vaccine, which is a 2 shot treatment, each using a gene fragment coding for a Spike protein but shot 1 uses one adenovirus shell as the carrier (“vector”, technical term) and shot 2 given at a later date uses another adenovirus shell KNOWN TOTHE BODY – which means it will not induce antibodies to the adenovirus shell, nor should the body attack it as foreign. That’s my understanding. See this diagram:

https://sputnikvaccine.com/local/templates/sputnik/img/infographics/eng.png

The below diagram is interesting, but I’m not sure of its validity or full meaning.

https://sputnikvaccine.com/upload/graph-en.svg

Now, a guy who has claimed in the past, apparently with no proper investigation or expertise, that the SarsCov2 virus does not exist, not refuting the 10,000’s of published scientific articles, hopefully has had second thoughts on this.
**A willingness to accept narratives Floated without critical examination is extremely unwise and self-dishonest. Let us be honest with ourselves.

One point I should make which was not clear in Steve’s discussion is that either an mRNA or a DNA vaccine coding for a Spike protein would target a strain of the Covid mRNA virus and some variants probably to a lesser extent, as the relatively rapidly mutating mRNA virus changes genetically over time). And, as Steve alluded, these shots will have some positive effect on the symptomology of the Covid infection– and thus against death or other lasting effects. It is unfortunate that the Covid genetic based shots coding for a Spike protein are self-spreading infecting the uninjected exposed to the injected.