National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 12.15.25

I appreciate David Duke being more moderate in what he said in his show today about Christianity and the old testament. It was more bearable to listen to than the last week of shows.

It is a pity there is no comment ability on his archive shows and that is why I wrote it here.

Although David Duke and Patrick and none of his rbn co hosts has ever replied to my comments.

I don’t know if any of them have seen any of my comments.

Probably not.

If they don’t read comments then that is up to them.

It might have been good comments for them to be aware of.

.

I would like to see David Duke and all of you start trying to have a time of seeing things from the perspective of a Ukrainian (non russian Ukrainian), or the perspective of any person.

In the situation where because of a disagreement in a country and between people about a government, or about authority, about a nation and state, just as it could be about religion or other things, or about more than one race or ethnic group, or a difference between people in a nation state and a country.

Then a conflict arises. No matter who you say is responsible for it, or for different aspects or stages of it.

And then it escalates to be more than the initial difference between the people, and more than the initial cause of disagreement or conflict.

As with unjust wars.
A cause doesn’t justify an outcome that is more unjust than the beginning situation.

A small number of people killed doesn’t justify a big number of people killed in response.
David Duke and other people are always agreeing about that about the world wars.
The small injustice at the beginning, didn’t justify the big unjust outcome of the wars. And did not justify the big number of deaths of by the end of the war.

One side in disagreement doesn’t deserve to override all the justice that the other side also deserves.
One side doesn’t deserve to get all the things that benefit it, and that the other side is forced or expected to sacrifice and only concede and lose a lot.
Or that one side comes out much better off than the other side.

So the main issue is.
If a minority number and group of people in a nation state.
Faces injustice somehow.
A number of people are killed.
Or they have less rights or are treated less equally than others.
Or they are discriminated against or treated as a lesser class of people.

Or they are just the loser share of the population who are not in power at this time, as is the common and normal working way of life in a democracy way of government.

A number of people will be disenfranchised in democracy every time that the people who represent them are not in power of government.

And in fact in democracy almost all people are not represented truly in the world today. Because democracy has governments that do what is not the will of the people and not the will even of the people who vote for that government.

This doesn’t give a justification of any kind, to separate land from a nation state.
Or to have a forced dictation of the government type, or of the sovereignty, or of the beliefs, and choice of how to run the nation.
Or to have a forced lesser treatment or a forced discrimination against the nation state. As a response to lesser treatment or discrimination against a number of people.

You do not legitimately respond to small injustice by creating big injustice.

.

I would like to see David Duke, Patrick, and his rbn co hosts. And all of you to think about this as a general situation.

Of justice. And of what is just, and what is a just response to small injustice?

Imagine yourself if you were a person who is in this situation.

For once imagine that you are a person who is on the side where your nation state is facing big injustice, of a response to small injustice.
Where the response is big injustice.

Some are suggesting to separate land from your nation state.
Or to have a forced dictation of the government type, or of the sovereignty, or of the beliefs, and choice of how to run the nation.
Or to have a forced lesser treatment or a forced discrimination against the nation state.
As a response to lesser treatment or discrimination against a number of people.

.

You have had a long time of seeing it all one way. Years of it.

Let’s hear you imagine to see it from the other side just for a change.

And see how these two sides compare, if you look at them with objective justice.

Thank you.

As usual my comment will not be taken into consideration and followed.

Not responded to on the radio show in any way, or in a reply.

And probably not seen.

But it would do good if you would listen for a change.

Thank you.

God bless us. Amen.