National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 09.15.25

The most obvious thing about all of this, if you ask me, is that the person we see in the surveillance video running across the roof and climbing down and jumping off the building did not have a gun. The gun they say he used would not have fit in his backpack. Even if he broke it down, the barrell would be too long, it wouldn’t fit in the backpack. And it would have taken him longer than a minute to break it down or disassemble it. Charlie Kirk was shot at 12:23 pm and the suspect was seen running across the roof and jumping down the building at 12:23 pm. He wasn’t the shooter. I think the plot to kill Charlie didn’t work out exactly as (((they))) planned and that (((they))) might be sweating over this right now. That suspect was probably instructed by his handlers to retrieve the weapon from the woods and take it to the school with him, but I don’t think he did. He could’ve fired one shot in the woods somewhere to make it look like it was used. The real shooter could’ve been on another level of the building. We”ll have to keep listening for more details, but one thing is for sure, that suspect did not have a gun. The people who planned this conspiracy probably conned the suspect into participating, but if the suspect didn’t bring the gun with him, that has to be a monkey wrench in (((their))) plan. I’m wondering if even maybe the suspect, as weird as he seems, may have actually outsmarted (((them))), because anyone who watches that surveillance video of him jumping down the roof can clearly see that he does not have a gun, and in my view, that is exactly what we should be talking about, and we should want this question to spread like wildfire, because I think (((they))) could be shitting (((their))) pants over this.