National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 02.20.26
By RBN
Related Articles
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Don Advo peeks out from behind enemy lines in Mexican-occupied California and discusses the Epstein business.
By RBN
Write a comment
6 Comments
View comments
My phone cut out twice during the first few minutes of this podcast.
The 9-11 (WTC) false-flag attack was mentioned.
Ted Gunderson (formerly head of the F.B.I. in southern California):
“There’s no question about who was responsible for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Through their informant … (the F.B.I. informant …) they had control of whether or not to place a dummy bomb or a real bomb there. They placed a real bomb, and the reason they did was to pass the anti-terrorism legislation. There were only six people killed—not enough to pass the legislation…. (So then in 1995 we had the Alfred Murrah Building in Oklahoma City—168 people killed—and then a year later they passed the anti-terrorism legislation.) But I’m telling you that the F.B.I. knew about this, they had control of it, and did nothing to stop it….
“Back in … the 1980s, the Department of Justice proposed legislation to ‘fight terrorism’, and this legislation took away many of our constitutional rights and civil liberties. One of the authors, a female attorney with the Department of Justice, publicly … made this statement … that before this passes people will have to be killed….
“That was the reason, I feel, for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing…. And now with the Twin Towers World Trade Center episode [in 2001], our Congress is now proposing further restrictions on our constitutional rights and civil liberties…. And that’s why our intelligence people not only knew about it in advance but probably [were] involved. There’s no question; you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Again:
“you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Three indisputable facts.
1. Steel-framed skyscrapers in America will not and cannot collapse because of fire. They are designed and constructed to remain standing even when fires are raging.
2. If the government had thought that the three buildings in New York had collapsed because of fire, then the authorities would have carefully examined all of the rubble in order to find out why and to determine the changes that needed to be made to the building codes. Since those in charge knew that fire did not cause the collapse of the buildings, all of the evidence (the rubble) was illegally disposed of as quickly as possible. Most of the large steel beams were shipped to China.
3. Since the wreckage of a jet airliner was not found at the Pentagon, it is certain that a jet airliner did not hit the Pentagon.
Paul Craig Roberts (americanfreepress.net/911-destroyed-america):
“The events on September 11, 2001 changed the world. It was the excuse for the U.S. government to launch military attacks on seven Middle Eastern countries, causing civilian casualties in the millions and sending waves of Muslim refugees into the Western world.”
“As there is no doubt whatsoever that Building 7 was wired for demolition, the question is why?”
“Only an uneducated and ignorant public can believe the official 9/11 story. The U.S. population fits this description.”
“Think now about physicists. How many physics faculties do you know that are not dependent on federal grants, usually for military-related work? The same for chemistry. Any physics professor who challenged the official story of 9/11 with the obvious fact that the story contravenes known laws of physics would endanger not only his own career but the careers of his entire department. …
“Our masters know this, and thus they can dispense with truth at will. Moreover, any expert courageous enough to speak the truth is easily branded a ‘conspiracy theorist.’
“Who comes to his defense? Not his colleagues. They want [to get] rid of him as quickly as possible. Truth is a threat to their careers. They can’t afford to be associated with truth. In America, truth is a career-killing word.
” … In the United States today people can lie at will without consequence, but it is deadly to tell the truth.”
“Professor Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics at BYU, was among the first to see that the official story was pure fantasy. His reward for speaking out was to have his tenure contract bought out by BYU, many believe under orders from the federal government backed up with the threat that all federal support of science at BYU would be terminated unless Stephen Jones was.”
Hear Frederick C. Blackburn explain to Jan Lamprecht why the alleged cell-phone calls were impossible:
archive.org/details/911theimpossiblecellphonecallsotherjewishliescrimes1_202003
A masterful shredding of the System’s 9-11 lies:
“9-11: The New Pearl Harbor”
archive.org/details/September11TheNewPearlHarbor
Jan Lamprecht introduces and shows a video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
archive.org/details/911architectsexpertsexplosions1_202002
“Painful Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmid:
archive.org/details/scm-23198-painfuldeceptions-part1of2
archive.org/details/scm-23202-painfuldeceptions-part2of2
Popular Mechanics magazine is credited with inducing the American sheeple to believe that the absurd “pancaking theory” explains how the two towers were able to collapse at near free-fall speed and turn to dust. And who was the “senior researcher” for that article? Someone named Benjamin Chertoff. Yes, a relative of Michael Chertoff. (If the floors had pancaked, the massive central steel columns would have remained standing.)
The January 2002 issue of Fire Engineering magazine characterized the FEMA investigation of the collapse of the three buildings as “a half-baked farce”. Eric Hufschmid: “Later that month, both Bush and Cheney asked Tom Dashiell to ‘limit the investigation’. Apparently, a half-baked farce was more of an investigation than Bush and Cheney wanted. I suppose they would have preferred a quarter-baked farce.”
Eric Hufschmid: “Controlled Demolition … developed a special explosive and technique of using it for demolishing steel structures. They are so proud of this technology that they trademarked its abbreviation: DREXS. Their British division describes the technology as ‘Our DREXS systems … segment steel components into pieces matching the lifting capacity of the available equipment.’ In other words, if your trucks can hold pieces of steel up to 24 feet in length, then this company will cause all steel assemblies to break into sections 24 feet or less. Look at the rubble of the World Trade Center. Is it a coincidence that the entire steel framework of both towers broke into pieces no longer than the trucks that were hauling them away? Only a few of the thousands of pieces had to be cut with torches.”
By using a system similar to DREXS, ZOG produced a pile of rubble (crime evidence) that could be disposed of quickly and relatively cheaply.
Why were the bomb-sniffing dogs removed five days before 9-11? They were removed so that explosives and incendiaries could be placed in the buildings.
Employees who were in the sub-basements of the North Tower say that they heard and felt explosions before an aircraft hit either tower.
If the buildings had not conveniently collapsed on that day, if they had merely been damaged, it would have been illegal to use controlled demolition to remove them. The buildings were full of asbestos. Before the buildings were eliminated, the Twin Towers had become liabilities. “The Port Authority was looking at an asbestos-abatement bill of as much as 1 billion dollars.”
Less than two months before the demolition of the Twin Towers, the Jew Larry Silverstein obtained a 99-year lease on them. After the buildings were demolished, he collected $4.5 billion from the insurance companies. What do you think. Was he just an extremely lucky Jew?
We have video showing molten steel flowing from one of the Twin Towers before either had collapsed.
Virtually all of the concrete in the floors of the Twin Towers was pulverized (converted to dust) before the floors even hit the ground. Doing that required a tremendous amount of energy, energy for which there is no evident source.
Some of the concrete was melted. How was a temperature high enough to do that generated? (Remember that “jet fuel” is simply kerosene.)
A stewardess from one of the planes left a message on her husband’s answering machine. The answering machine showed that the call had been made by her cell-phone. She recited the tale of how the plane had been hijacked, but just before she hung up, she said hastily and quietly, “It’s a frame!”
Since the call was made with her cell-phone, we know that she was on the ground, not in the air. She was being forced by her captors to lie to her husband.
If she had actually been in a hijacked airplane, she would not have ended her call with “It’s a frame!”
It has been shown that many, if not all, of the alleged hijackers were still alive after 9-11. That’s rather puzzling, isn’t it? I didn’t know that it was possible for a man who is alive today to have been killed on an earlier day. But if the System says that it is so, then it must be so!
In violation of protocol, not a single fighter plane was scrambled to go after the hijacked airliners. We are told that a large plane was allowed to penetrate the most heavily defended airspace in the world on its way to the Pentagon and was not shot down by a missile or even challenged by a fighter plane.
The military commanders who were responsible for protecting New York City and Washington, D.C. on that day were not punished for their malfeasance. Instead, they were all promoted.
The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.) Like all hijackers, that Arab was extremely sweet and saintly, and he was given superhuman powers by God to enable him to complete his mission.
A flight instructor at the school where he was pretending to learn to fly an airplane said: “I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”
The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were nine feet in diameter and largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.
Where an airplane crashes, airplane wreckage is found. When you find the airplane wreckage, you’ve found where the airplane crashed. The wreckage of a Boeing 757 was not found at the Pentagon. Therefore, a Boeing 757 did not crash at the Pentagon. Anyone who can’t understand that is simple-minded.
Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”
Understand? He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”
Understand? He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.