Authentic News with Jim Fetzer, March 2, 2026 Hour 1

The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.) Like all hijackers, that Arab was extremely sweet and saintly, and he was given superhuman powers by God to enable him to complete his mission.

A flight instructor at the school where he was pretending to learn to fly an airplane said: “I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”

The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were nine feet in diameter and largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.

Where an airplane crashes, airplane wreckage is found. When you find the airplane wreckage, you’ve found where the airplane crashed. The wreckage of a Boeing 757 was not found at the Pentagon. Therefore, a Boeing 757 did not crash at the Pentagon. Anyone who can’t understand that is simple-minded.

Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”

Understand? He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.

Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”

Understand? He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.

Norman Mineta, Transportation Secretary, in sworn testimony before the 9/11 Commission, described what happened as the aircraft approached the Pentagon: “There was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President ‘The plane is 50 miles out’, ‘The plane is 30 miles out.’ And when he got down to ‘The plane is 10 miles out’, the young man also said to the Vice President ‘Do the orders still stand?’ and the Vice President … whipped his neck around and said ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'”

It’s obvious that the orders in question were not to shoot down the incoming aircraft.

Mineta’s testimony was omitted from the final “9/11 Commission Report”.

In 2004 the 9/11 Commission interviewed Douglas Cochrane, the young man who said “Do the orders still stand?” Of course, the interview has been withdrawn from public access, and it still remains classified.

The F.B.I. confiscated many tapes from security cameras that showed the aircraft approaching the Pentagon, and then they refused to release them to the public. We were finally given a few frames of video from two cameras that were taken at the moment of approach and impact. However, both cameras had the same point of view, and the frames do not show the aircraft. (The cameras only took one picture per second.) At least one frame had been doctored.

Why doesn’t the F.B.I. release all of the video tapes? Isn’t this system supposed to be government “by the people”? Don’t the people, the rulers of the country, have the right to know the truth? The F.B.I. doesn’t want us to know the truth. The F.B.I. doesn’t want us to know what actually hit the Pentagon.

Those who have made themselves masters of this country believe that we are their slaves.

Ted Gunderson (formerly head of the F.B.I. in southern California):

“There’s no question about who was responsible for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Through their informant … (the F.B.I. informant …) they had control of whether or not to place a dummy bomb or a real bomb there. They placed a real bomb, and the reason they did was to pass the anti-terrorism legislation. There were only six people killed—not enough to pass the legislation…. (So then in 1995 we had the Alfred Murrah Building in Oklahoma City—168 people killed—and then a year later they passed the anti-terrorism legislation.) But I’m telling you that the F.B.I. knew about this, they had control of it, and did nothing to stop it….

“Back in … the 1980s, the Department of Justice proposed legislation to ‘fight terrorism’, and this legislation took away many of our constitutional rights and civil liberties. One of the authors, a female attorney with the Department of Justice, publicly … made this statement … that before this passes people will have to be killed….

“That was the reason, I feel, for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing…. And now with the Twin Towers World Trade Center episode [in 2001], our Congress is now proposing further restrictions on our constitutional rights and civil liberties…. And that’s why our intelligence people not only knew about it in advance but probably [were] involved. There’s no question; you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”

Again:

“you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”

Three indisputable facts.

1. Steel-framed skyscrapers in America will not and cannot collapse because of fire. They are designed and constructed to remain standing even when fires are raging.

2. If the government had thought that the three buildings in New York had collapsed because of fire, then the authorities would have carefully examined all of the rubble in order to find out why and to determine the changes that needed to be made to the building codes. Since those in charge knew that fire did not cause the collapse of the buildings, all of the evidence (the rubble) was illegally disposed of as quickly as possible. Most of the large steel beams were shipped to China.

3. Since the wreckage of a jet airliner was not found at the Pentagon, it is certain that a jet airliner did not hit the Pentagon.

In May 2002, FEMA released its report on the collapse of the buildings. We read: “The specifics of the fires in Building 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”

Experts who watched videos of the collapse of Building 7 say that the building had definitely been prepared for demolition by professionals.

Silverstein explained why it was decided to “pull” (demolish) Building 7: “I said ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.”

Why had Building 7 already been prepared for demolition? Why was it possible to “pull” the building on the spur of the moment?