National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 09.4.25
Related Articles
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Paul Stevenson joins the show: Venezuela, Ukraine, Jews, and Squirrels chasing Dogs as a sign of the End Times
Write a comment
2 Comments
View comments



An issue for thought:
The new world order system russia and china want to develop and impose, today.
Or the post world war 2 (new world order) system up to now.
What about a different choice than these two systems?
We are being told to accept only a choice between two choices:
liberalism democracy (or americanism identity),
or a new system not yet decided or created that russia and china are taking action to develop as the replacement system for the world and for nations and people.
And anyway we are only allowed to have one of these two systems.
But it is not actually a choice that we can have a choice to choose ourselves between two choices. Because they want a system to be imposed on us, without us being able to make a choice.
We are only allowed to have a system that is founded and built on accepting the world war 2 result, the world war 2 view, and the post world war 2 system.
No other choice is allowed. And both the two systems and their supporters agree to want to act to prevent us having any other alternative than one of these two, and to prevent us from having a real choice.
Europe and most of the world were monarchy or autocrat and national states or empires, for most of significant civilization history. The usa was a deviant oddity.
(not very like the few examples of short term republics or democracy that previously existed. Roman republic became monarchal empire. I am not sure if I am correct but I think Greek athenian democracy was direct peoples’ participation in votes on issues, not elected representatives deciding all issues. I think only the single city state of athens was a democracy, not all greeks. And it lasted a short time of a few centuries, and was considered weak. and was replaced by autocracy or oligarchy. I am not sure what a merchant republic like venice was like but it seems it was autocracy or maybe oligarchy.).
But ever since the usa deviant liberalism democracy system began. People who are supremacists of that political ideology, have been doing action by all means they are able to use to have their image and ideology system imposed on all of the world. With no respect for morality in relation to people or for goodness of system or best system, or rightness, or Christian doctrine and religion, or natural law and order. And in most actions acted against all of that and against anything good or right.
I think the usa people (and people who like this system) are brainwashed to believe their identity and image and system are good and the best and the only correct system. And at the same time they might have unease and realize it is untrue and is not good or the best or the correct system. Especially with the examples of alternatives existing in the world and that they and everyone can see and are aware of the alternatives. And that the alternatives to the usa system have existed before it and have existed for most of history as the only usual systems or manner of significant states or societies of civilizations. And are the natural order.
And so in fear of their identity and system etc. not being the correct or good or best way of life and of nation. They are committed to action in order to destroy the natural and already existing and long lasting historical and all other alternatives.
And to impose their way on the whole world.
Exactly identical to the jewish (break or destroy & then remake the world, tikkum olam) destroy the clay pot or the world and then remake and replace it with a different opposing nature of pot or world. You know. Destroy the existing form of the world and then make it exist new in only the form you impose by force. To last with your form imposed forever. And never any alternative choices existing again.
How can the system that appeared with the usa revolution in rebellion against the existing and natural order of the Christian European people and nations, and without any basis of legitimate authority,
(also protestantism did rebellion in the same illegitimate way against the existing and natural order of the Christian European people and nations without any basis of legitimate authority),
be legitimate to exist at all in the first place? Or to be put in replacement of the natural order that existed already before it? And to be imposed to destroy and replace the natural order and the existing order in the whole world?
And we know this has been done by wars, and post wars coercion, and economic coercion, and whatever other ways it has been done but by deceit and immorality and illegitimacy and wrongness and injustice and evil action and goal and outcome.
Communism came later as another kind of liberalism democracy destroying the natural order and existing order. And replacing it with a system in the name and pretext of much of the same kind of foundation and principles of liberalism and democracy.
It just appears different but is a same kind of destroyer and replacer of the natural order and the existing order.
Liberalism democracy, or the americanism image.
And communism. Are both intended to destroy the natural order and all alternative existing systems or forms of people and nations.
After the world conquest between the two of these, in world war 2. They continued to try to impose their world supremacy domination on all of the world. Destroying what alternatives still existed after world war 2 or had existed during the time after world war 2.
So as we know, dictatorships were destroyed. Most monarchies are gone, the few that remain were coerced to surrender sovereignty and to be constitutional monarchies, but really no longer the natural order, and have had to be subservient to governments that are liberalism democracy, and have not been able to stop any evil that has come and been imposed from this.
Liberalism democracy or americanism, and communism might have competed genuinely to become sole victor, and for eachother to disappear. Or might have accepted eachother to continue but just competed over the proportion of the division of the world between them.
It seemed the liberalism democracy or americanism image did in the end become the sole remaining one, and that communism disappeared, almost, with a few exceptions remaining like china, north korea, iran, venezuela, the recently fallen nations of syria, libya, iraq, who had alternative systems.
Although even some of those like venezuela, china, syria, which were not total dictatorships were probably partly a liberalism democracy.
But did communism really get outcompeted and lose? There is a question if it faked its disappearance and remained or even expanded its influence and direction of nations and people, less openly or visibly recognizably. Because it had appeared that liberalism democracy was the winner and communism disappeared and was out of sight and out of mind.
With russia’s behaviour about its determination to continue the world war 2 view.
And to continue the after world war 2 international system or form of the world, built on the result of what ideologies won world war 2 and which ideologies lost and were suppressed and outlawed and prosecuted and villified.
And to continue the values and system forced and imposed on the world and nations and people after world war 2 and since.
And russia says china agrees and has determination to act for those same goals.
I am questioning if russia is in fact behaving in the same result of behaviour, as liberalism democracy or americanism image, and communism.
In making actions in the goal of imposing a result as unacceptable as liberalism democracy or americanism image and as communism, of imposing on the world and people and nations, an ideology system that destroys and replaces and prevents the existence of the natural order and of the earlier existing order or alternatives to these post world war 2 systems which are all imposing globalism on nations against the sovereignty and will of national peoples. And are evil.
And which we are fighting against all of this. Aren’t we?
Aren’t we fighting for the natural order and for alternatives to the post world war 2 system. And fighting against all this:
Of which ideologies won the victory of world war 2.
And of the after world war 2 system etc. forced and imposed on the world and kept imposed ever since.
And of the suppression and villification of the ideologies which lost world war 2.
And of the suppression and prevention of the natural order and of the alternatives that existed before world war 2 or before world war 1 or before in history or of any other alternatives?
After world war 2 liberalism democracy or americanism image, and communism, still cooperated between them, with the UN and the rest of the post world war 2 international system or order, to impose on the world a replaced order and to which no alternative is allowed to exist.
Russia and china now claiming and wanting to appear to be an alternative or more fair or balanced system
(only because populations and power and economic wealth and development of nations have altered over time. So that other nations outside europe and outside nations of european descent, have caught up or sometimes pulled ahead of europe and nations of european descent.),
to be developed but still forced to be founded on and continuing and keeping the world war 2 view, and the world war 2 outcome, and the post world war 2 system, and determined to prevent any alternatives that exist outside of those limits.
Within nations liberalism democracy or the americanism image, has been imposed on most or all of the world. And it is still imposed on most nations. And elections of governments, and actions governments can take, are all only allowed to be within the limits of the imposed system of liberalism democracy or americanism image. We are not allowed to choose alternatives to that system. We are not allowed to choose alternatives who want to change that system or to have a different alternative system.
In the international system. I suggest that the same is being imposed on us.
The international system is post world war 2, it coincides with liberalism democracy or americanism image. And communism also took part and had influence and power in the system.
We see the anti racism, anti hate, anti nationalism, that was created by this international system and forced and imposed on nations.
Which destroyed our national sovereignty, identity, freedom of choice and life, freedom of expression and speech. And imposed immigration and multi culturalism and anti nationalism, and prevented us being allowed to oppose it.
Even politicians and our governments are limited in choices and actions and speech, by the international system and the laws it has imposed on our nations and people in our laws.
Anti racism laws, speech restriction laws, were mainly forced into the international system and forced and imposed on our nations and people, by the repeated action of the soviet union or russia, in the UN treaties and policies.
Even in the 1960s, after David Duke wants to claim russia freed itself from jews, as if it means they repented and changed their thinking and behaviour and goals, and stopped the internationalism action and goal of being anti White and anti the sovereignty and identity of nations, and stopped promoting anti colonialism and decolonization (e.g. all the african countries in 1960s on, and also before, and their communist and anti White revolutionary or political forces), and promoting communism. They continued in their actions of doing all of that.
I think that the fact that the soviet union continued action to promote communism and subversion of national sovereignty and identity, for all of the time up to the end of the soviet union. Is proof that they did not change and become good.
Whether or not jews had influence or power still. Which they probably were never overthrown and did still have power.
Because the soviet union continued having the same thinking and goals and action internationally of international subversion and destruction of national sovereignty and identity. So why would they have to overthrow jews if they continued the same behaviour and goals internationally.
The same as the usa continues with the same behaviour and goals as jews. And so unless the usa changes behaviour and goals, or the usa overthrows jews and changes behaviour and goals. Then the usa has no reason to overthrow jews, unless it is going to take a different choice of behaviour and goals.
Immigration promotion and imposing, was probably also imposed in the international system by the action of the soviet union or russia.
Even in the 2000s and today, repeated every year including in the last year. Russia has introduced anti racism promotion and hate speech restriction, etc. and not discriminating against foreigners or immigrants, at the UN, to be imposed internationally, to be forced and imposed on all nations and people, against national sovereignty and identity.
It makes national people discriminated against because they are limited in freedom and speech and foreigners and immigrants have special protection and treatment, and speech and national policy is restricted or promoted to favour them, and to restrict the national people.
This is one of the main problems affecting us today and causing our destruction and preventing our resurrection. And it was primarily caused by jews and the soviet union and russia.
Jews of course will act to continue it.
And russia is declaring it is determined to continue behaving in the same way. And to continue forcing us to be restrained and enslaved in this same hostile and genocidal to us system.
Look at the world today. And look at russia’s actions. And at the result that its actions will have.
And think about it, and consider if what I am saying is correct and right?
Are russia helping us?
Or are they just giving a different new false face to continue what will be a hostile system to us, and which will prevent us from having a system that will give us the salvation and freedom that we really need.
Of resurrection of the natural order and securing of freedom and sovereignty for nations and people?
The evil powers are taking action to continue the system, and to only allow an alternative system or any appearance of alternative system, within the limits of continuing to be the same direction and goal of system, and with the same goals.
And against sovereignty of nations and people.
They want it to be the only system (to exist or to be allowed) and not to allow the natural order and the earlier order that existed in history before world war 2, or any other alternatives.
Thank you for reading this.
Please consider it.
God bless you and all of us.
I have a follow up thought.
The new russia and china led bloc is like the cold war russia led bloc. Do you really think that is a good thing?
In the cold war the two main power blocs dominated the world.
Because of the result of world war 2.
Forget exactly what ideology or way of life each of the two blocs stood for and promoted.
Both ideologies were wrong and bad anyway.
But one of the two blocs seemingly dissolved itself and was ended (in around 1989 to1991). The russia led bloc.
And the other bloc was left as the winner of the world and unopposed or not able to be challenged for a time. The usa led bloc.
Now imagine if it had happened differently. And that it was the usa led bloc that had fallen, or dissolved itself. And it had been the russia led bloc that was left as the winner of the world?
After the usa led bloc won unipolar power, we realized it was not good for us. And we want to be free from this usa led bloc as being the winner of the world.
People see that russia and china are being a different bloc, contrary to the usa led bloc.
But that doesn’t mean this is good to have instead.
If the russia and china led bloc would now replace the unpopular usa led bloc.
This would be like trying an alternative course of history, of if the usa led bloc had fallen or dissolved itself, and that the russia led bloc had been the winner of the world.
That would also not have been a good thing.
And that russia led bloc would today be unpopular like the usa led bloc is today.
Both blocs were not good and were unpopular.
They were both wrong. And we and the world shouldn’t have been coerced to have to accept these two blocs, either to accept one or the other of these blocs, or both, as the winners of the world.
We aren’t going to be free, by switching from the usa led bloc, to embracing a russia and china led bloc. It is like going from alignment to the one bloc in the cold war to the other bloc.
They are opposed to eachother. And just because russia and china and the others in the bloc are aligning against the usa led bloc. And that we also see the usa led bloc as bad for us and against us and so we are against it. It doesn’t mean that the russia and china led bloc is not bad for us or is not against us or is good for us.
Have people really looked to see if the russia and china led bloc is good or not bad for us, as White or European people and nations? And as true Christians?
Is the russia and china led bloc going to support our people and nations and interests? Or not to be negative or harmful to them?
Isn’t it a bloc of mostly non White and non European people, mostly non true Christian people? Aren’t many of these nations people, or political leaders, people who have anti White attitudes?
And who see the bloc a lot in terms of anti White and anti European colonial grievances and wanting to compete against and eventually outsize or dominate over the power of White people and European people and true Christians?
Like a coalition of nations of people who are mostly non White people and non European people and mostly non true Christians.
And a lot of who might be anti White people and anti European people and anti true Christians.
Who want to erode our historic leading amount of power in the world, and our sovereignty. And would probably wish us to be a minority in power, like a democracy of the world. Where majority population has majority power.
In our countries we are being made minorities of the population, and having our power and sovereignty eroded and diminished.
The russia and china led bloc of mostly non White and non European and non true Christian people, looks like it would have the same effect for our nations as a minority in the world. And to have power eroded and diminished to be a minority in the world.
Do you really think it is good to go from usa led bloc as winners of the world, to the russia and china led bloc as winners of the world?
Or having to have a cold war of the two blocs as having the world pulled and stretched or and divided between them both?
I don’t feel that either of these is good for, or has the good of White people or European people, or true Christians, at heart, or intended.
I think it was wrong and bad that these two blocs won world war 2, and were the winners of the world in the cold war after world war 2 and that everyone was coerced to have to align with one of these two blocs.
There was a third group called non aligned, meaning not exactly in either of the two blocs, and this was the true original meaning of the third world, rather than meaning poor or backward or underdeveloped or non White countries.
First world was supposed to be the usa led bloc, and second world meant the russia led bloc. I think so anyway.
Eventually all the non aligned nations were weak and had to align with one bloc or the other, or were attacked or overthrown, or gradually had to change.
I think those names and meanings were actually not correct to use, but they were created for after world war 2.
I would say truly instead that the first world was better to use as meaning the European Christian world or even the whole world, before the usa or liberal democracy revolutions and imposition.
And that the revolutionary world of democracies, or other new order systems, was the second world.
Then counter revolution against and to undo that, is what might be called third world but I would just say it is first world again, if it is truly trying to erase the revolution and democracy and have the natural order again.
Also some people call it the old world or the old world order to refer to Christian Europe and other natural order nations before revolution and democracy. And call the revolutions and democracy as the new world and the new world order. This is intended to make new to sound best and preferable to old, and that old is obselete and new is self evident and mandatory.
Instead I will use true world order. Or God world order. Or Christian world order. Or natural world order. For the Christian European order that existed before the revolutions and democracy acted to overthrow and replace it.
I think true world order is best to use. As the names of God world order, Christian world order, natural order, all include the sense that they are the true order. And the true order includes them. And it can also include the natural order of other nations before the revolutions and democracy, too.
I don’t think the usa led bloc, or the new russia and china led bloc, look good for Christian European people, or for Christian White people, or for true Christians.
And I want to have a world that certainly is good for us.
I want our sovereignty and freedom and existence to be secure in the world and not threatened.
And so I don’t think either of the blocs are good for us or for the world.
We need a good and different choice for the world than that.
Neither of them is our team for the championing of us and of our interests.
Let’s look for and champion a different and correct way for the world and that is exactly good for us.
Thank you for reading.
Please consider it.
God bless us.