National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 06.4.25

Patrick said ron unz said germany or hitler was on good terms (or had mutual trust) with the soviet union or stalin, for some time (or a while).

Germany was never friendly with the soviet union, they always saw it as a threat. As a foreign jewish (supremacist and anti national peoples and anti Christian) enemy who seized russia by force by revolution, and who carried out genocide of people and the overthrow of the national people and civilization. And who built enormous military force and enormous industrial force to support the military.

And who also seized germany, hungary in 1919, by force by revolution. And who built the red athiest army to conquer & genocide the people in russia & then used it to attack & invade poland in 1919 or 1920 to try & seize poland.

The purge you often talk about, of the 30s at around a similar time as one of the holodomors, was not purging jews & getting russians back in more control. Stalin remained connected with jews as his close people in power & in his wives or family partners or inlaws and friends, all of which included jews as his close group of associates. Jews always have a strong influence for leading for the benefit of the jewish direction and interests on those who are their associates. Today & then & always.

Jews were not powerless and also did not lose or diminish in dominant power over the soviet union, in the purges or before or during the war.

If you search for how much power or positions jews had or dominated in the soviet union still after the purges & through the war you will find they still dominated & had very high disproportionate power.

An article by someone I think it might have been john wear, also showed that the soviet military was not weakened by the purges as some say (they assume experienced officers being purged means less experienced ones take their place). But rather it gave the military more strength as the experience or ability was not diminished really, & opposition or less close or loyal ones were replaced. And it became more strong & united in direction or thinking. The purges resulted in a stronger more united military leadership, & stronger soviet military as a threat to other nations, but still dominated by jewish influence.

The purges just changed people in positions but jews still dominated power, and still did all through the war.

As david duke said to you on a recent radio program, ilya ehrenberg incited the mass killing & brutality against germans & the mass rapes, this was said still in 1945. Ehrenberg was also claiming the genocide of millions of jews, saying it in 1945 & maybe also 1944 I think. So there was a special treatment of importance about jews by him, as a jew.

Also there were the political commissar officers, who were dominantly or maybe all jews, who accompanied the army & murdered anyone who surrendered or were cowards or not loyal or didn’t obey orders of attacks or of crimes of brutal illegal behaviours in war.

And the jewish commissars probably also are main & some of the worst people who executed or tortured etc. surrendered german or other soldiers or civilians illegally & unjustly.

As we know jews dominated media in the usa, & dominated the war media & propaganda & the influence on government in both usa & the british empire. Before the war & ongoing.

If you search the internet: how many jews fought in world war 2. You will find answers from holocaust museums etc, saying 1.5 million jews fought as soldiers in the (jewish) allied militaries. About half a million of them fought for the usa & british empire, & about 1 million fought for the soviet union.

Of course jews do not like being average low ranking people. And so there were several generals in both usa & soviet sides, many officers, & on the usa side & probably british too jews also were political officers or military police who watch the soldiers & punish any who don’t follow the orders & attacks even if it involves pressuring or forcing them to do war crimes. (Although many of the anti german soldiers were not moral & did war crimes willingly or by their own choice & idea).

In addition to the 1.5 million jewish soldiers, against the axis.
If you search for how many jews fought as (terrorists) partisans. The searches & holocaust sites tell you that 100 thousand jews fought as (terrorists) partisans. Most were on the eastern front, but they were in every country in europe. France, poland, netherlands etc, yugoslavia region. In every country. They call them the resistance. And indeed the resistance was dominantly jewish in all countries in europe, either by numbers or by leadership, & sometimes they were the majority of the resistance.

This huge number of jews fighting is another counter information to the lie that millions died in a genocide, or the deliberately promoted impression that jews as a whole or in total were innocent & no threat & passive & non violent & powerless or helpless victims. And that they had no defence or defenders for jews either given by themselves or most other peoples.

I don’t think many jewish soldiers died. Perhaps one or only a few tens of thousands or less.
And not sure how many terrorists died maybe a few thousand or not many tens of thousands.

Then you have the about 100 thousand to 110 thousand jews who died in detainment camps to detain enemies in the war, who were part of a people who were at war with germany & who had these 1.5 million soldiers & 100 thousand terrorists fighting.
And probably all jews did criminal acts of some kind, whether normal crimes or vice or breaking laws, or sabotage, or incitement & anti national propoganda or behaviour. It is the always the way of life for all jews in all of history, unless they repent & reject identity of being a jew, or of being part of a jewish people.

The non aggression pact of germany and the soviet union was made in august 1939. Just before the two of them invaded poland. And it ended in june 1941 when germany invaded the soviet union.

So it was only two years. That is not a long time.
That is to answer what you said. That ron unz said germany or hitler was on good terms with or friendly with the soviet union or stalin for some time (or a while).

If you search the history of it, or watch the europa documentary, you will see that the reason for the non aggression pact is: the jews, usa, br, fr, poland, wanted war against germany. And were looking to incite a war, & they wanted the soviet union to be on their side & to open an eastern front against germany after britain and france attacked from the west, & probably poland will be the cause of war beginning & so will fight germany from the east, & perhaps the soviet union (& maybe other slavs like czechs) could help poland. And usa would also enter later.
They wanted the soviet union to join them in war, like in world war 1, (& a bit like the napoleonic wars). To assure defeat of germany more easily & severely.

The allies had already begun negotiating with stalin by august & still were there negotiating with him, when hitler saw the danger of war & of the soviet union allying with the allies. And that it would wait until they exhausted eachother, & then enter later (like the usa also planned & did & does) & conquer germany & also conquer the allies & europe.

Stalin delayed agreeing to the allies, as he wanted the two sides to fight & weaken eachother. And for him to not commit to enter, & to enter & take all of europe later.

Hitler offered the non aggression pact & stalin agreed.
Stalin still thought it means the two sides will exhaust eachother. While he is not involved & can enter & conquer them all later (before usa joins).

You say you think stalin was not intending conquest. That he was risk averse. And he wanted just to take care of his national state socialism or communism.

No he was not national socialist. He is not at all like national socialism or fascism. And he was not a national or one state communism either.

Not national because that refers to the national ethnic people and the soviet union was opposite to that and anti the national peoples & replacing them in power like is being done to our nations and our national peoples today.
It is another proof that his state was jewish as it was anti national peoples. Like today in nations where jews have power.

And not one state communism. Because he did seek to conquer by force, as well as revolutions, or elections.

If you search for that (soviet union conquests or aggression) you will see.

The spanish elections where communists had connection with & money & aid & organization from the soviet union. And they were elected in 1936 and led to the civil war of 1936 to 1939 (march, the non aggression pact signed only six months later after there had been germany & soviet union on opposite sides in hostile spanish civil war) in which the soviet union also helped & was militarily (& terrorist) involved. Also jews were involved in the terrorists or resistance in the spanish civil war, who did usual for jews terrorist brutalities. And these jewish terrorists in spain moved into france after defeat in the spanish war, and they later became a main dominant group of the terrorists french resistance in late world war 2.

After the soviet union took part of poland in sep 1939.
In the next year they invaded & took the baltic states, some involved a war of the states resisting them.
They invaded finland and there was a war of finland resisting, but a part of finland was taken.
They took bessarabia, I think it was part of romania but now I think it might be moldova or near it.

This was all between 1939 and early 1941 I think.

Hitler was not happy with this, he was against it, but was quiet & even no anti soviet propaganda or talk, because of the non aggression pact.

The soviet diplomats kept asking germany to agree to more soviet gains in europe. These were going beyond the former russian empire lands.

They wanted a sphere of influence & a base, on each of about the tip of denmark so they can control the sea there from the north sea to the baltic sea to the soviet union.
And they wanted the same of a sphere of influence & base in the straits of turkey, to control the sea from the mediterranean & aegean sea to the black sea & to the soviet union.
And possibly to extend an influence into bulgaria & yugoslavia.

They also asked romania to give up more of romania.

Each of these demands were too much & unacceptable for hitler. They would harm security & position of germany & of europe.
And the baltic sea as the access for the majority of germany to the north sea has to be in control of germany not a threatening state.
He also did not want soviet influence in yugoslavia or the balkans & so coming closer to germany all around.
And romania was the main source for germany’s oil supply & it would not be able to meet its needs especially in a war, without it. And the part of romania stalin was demanding was where the oil is.

The soviet demands were deliberately excessive and unacceptable. And for soviet benefits at the high expense of germany.

So the point was reached. And although in 1941 germany was at war with britain, and at peace with now defeated france & mainland europe was secured for germany. And the balkans was secured (to keep out britain) first in early 1941, before going to invade the soviet union.

Then hitler could not delay any longer. And had to have the war with the soviet union.

As I have said. The soviet union had conquered nations between 1939 and 1941.
Unlike for germany the soviet conquests were not necessary conquests, like as a result of attacks by poland on germans, or declarations of war by britain or france.
The soviet conquests were just for conquest by choice.

Also as part of the civil war or communist anti russia war, and the war to conquer ukraine afterwards. Then ukraine had been conquered too. As well as the rest of the russian empire to the east and the central asian nations.

So you are incorrect to say stalin was not a threat, didn’t intend to conquer, and was risk averse, and only cared about doing things in his one state.

In addition to all this.
You can search the topic of the soviet military build up in spring and summer 1941 on the western front. Planned & intending to attack and conquer germany & all of europe in summer 1941 to take place just a couple of weeks after hitler ordered the invasion of the soviet union.

Hitler saw the military invasion force build up & had to attack preemptively to defeat the soviet attack.

John wear has articles on this, and people like the institute for historical review, and many other people. It is mentioned in most pro german documentaries about the invasion.

There is a book called ice breaker, about it by a soviet defector.

And there are documents from the soviet archives, of the soviet invasion of germany, plans and date, orders. Numbers etc.

Testimony of stalin saying about it (decision to conquer germany by summer 1941) to officers in early 1941, etc.

It is easy to find. Ron unz probably also has information about it on his site.

I think I gave a lot of information. All to answer the point. To say that stalin snd the soviet union were not passive or only going to stay as one state. They did intend conquest of all of europe and eventually the world. Proof of that is of communism spreading and conquering china and so many other nations (and failing but trying in many other nations) after world war 2. And that they did conquer multiple nations unprovoked and unjustly before the german war with the soviet union. And that the conquest of the russian empire involved conquering many national peoples (including russians & ukraine & central asians & others) by force as they didn’t want to be ruled by the foreign and communist government power.

I hope perhaps you might consider changing your mind. Or to search information on these questions. Then deciding what you think is true. Rather than saying some people say stalin wanted to conquer but you think he was not like that, but that you are not searching to have knowledge to decide what is true. Obviously people who say hitler was right and had to invade to save germany and europe from immediate impending and alresdy prepared conquest, are saying it because they have seen evidence and reasoning to think that is true. It is not just something they decide is true without a basis.

Why do you want to think it is not true? Because you want to think well of russia or putin now? As opponents of liberalism led by the jews & usa & EU or some of europe.

But the problem is russia seemed like an opponent of the unipolar jew & usa liberal secular power.

But. They also have faults. They are still promoting secular liberal democracy in some type, and multiculturalism, and some of liberal secular values.

They still oppose a nationalist state if it is pro hitler and national socialism or fascism.

Russia villifies these and do not allow us to have national socialism, fascism, which are the only real opposition to liberalism. And are the only ones that have worked in succeeding to be strong enough to able to defeat it while it rules almost the whole world or the strongest nations or empires.

They want to make it illegal in the constitution for ukraine and any other nation to have a positive view of or to choose hitler or national socialism or fascism.

As it was russia who created and caused to be passed a resolution recurring every year at the UN since the early 2000s, calling for all nations in the world to outlaw racial discrimination, and anti semitism, and glorification or positive view of or saying hitler or national socialism or fascism are good, and holocaust denial.

These laws about outlawing of & forced villifying of the hitler & national socialist & fascist & axis side & ways of life or thought, have been passed in most of europe & all countries have this stigma that they can never say hitler is good at least if they are people in governments, and they all say the holocaust is true and that you can’t say it is a lie.

Russia constantly reinforces this in the world.

They were an aid to nationalism for some years.

But those laws caused by their resolutions at the UN for the benefit of jews, and of russia to make itself look as good in the war instead of as the evil communist murderers and conquerors who they were & who hitler saved us from for years. Has hurt us and our nations immensely & kept us from freedom & kept enslaving us & attacking & knocking down those who try to free us & our nations today.

If russia had done some good sometime in recent years, doesn’t mean it does good all the time or no bad. Or that it is doing so now. Or that the good is more outweighing than the bad. I don’t think it is anymore.
And since the last year russia has got worse in these bad things. Especially as it gained a bigger advantage in ukraine & began to be more unjust in dictating terms about denying ukraine or any nation the choice of its sovereignty of the national identity and way of life and thinking to have for itself, & the size of army, who & what choice of world view position can be in the government, who they can have a foreign nation relationship with & what they or their friends can do in their territory, what weapons they can have (like missiles), while all of these restrictions or laws do not apply to the one asking someone else to be bound by these rules. And also the demand to keep territory conquered in war. It sounds like the versaille treaty to germany.

Today we see the same kind of behaviour to iran, from the jews & the usa & few others (britain, france, germany, now italy) of unjust demands, & hypocritically not applying to the ones asking to force them or to many others. And with threat of war & destruction, to seek to coerce acceptance.

And the same behaviour hypocritical of demands & only applying to some but not to the ones making the demands, was done to (a long list of) other nations regime changed in wars or revolutions or threats. Or attempted like with north korea.

I think russia must be getting uncomfortable to see how iran is being bullied about sovereignty now. And I hope perhaps it will make the russians consider and have self awareness and realize and see how they are behaving the same hypocritical way to ukraine about sovereignty. That they want to dictate how ukraine can exist & live like. But they don’t want that done to them, or even much to iran. Although I think russia doesn’t support iran’s sovereignty fully as it is still saying they should compromise some of it, like they said also about syria, when people particularly jews & usa pressured those nations with demands.

We have to be free in our nations.

Russia, EU, european nations, jews, usa, no one has a right to dictate to other nations how they must live like, what rules they must live by when others do not, or to impose liberalism and secularism & democracy, which forcibly took the place of and prevented Catholic nations, Christianity, ethnic nationalism, monarchy, autocracy, etc.

We have the right to have our nation as we choose. Including Catholic, non secular, ethnic nationalist, national socialist or fascist, etc.

I hope you read this.
I would like you to consider it, and hopefully reconsider your view.

Thanks for reading.