What does jeremy think of david duke’s liberalism views of Christianity?
Such as in his 8 dec 25 show he even indicated that he rejects God killing all of mankind and other life except for those who were on the ark, in the flood:
.
which is a prefigurement and looking forward to in faith, of the Catholic Church Jesus established being the ark through which Jesus saves us and in which we have communion with Him, and that there is salvation only by truly being faithfully and obediently (not rebelliously rejecting it from inside or outside) in the Catholic Church and there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, which is the new ark of salvation, the body of Jesus which carries us, all of the faithful in faith and obedience who are united in communion with Jesus and the Holy Trinity, in salvation in Jesus.
He (david duke) believes that God is his idea of God. And his interpretation of what that idea of God, and of what God is love, is to be.
If he thinks God would not do something, like killing all of mankind and other life except for those on the ark, in the flood, then he thinks his opinion is valid to reject what it says in the bible and what has always been taught by the Catholic Church, and almost all schismatic other Christian churches, and what was written and affirmed and taught by the Church fathers, and what Jesus and Saint Peter affirmed in the new testament.
.
The new testament was written by Christians it was written by the Catholic Church, and the Catholic Church and Christians accepted it and they did not dispute it, and they did not dispute that Jesus and Saint Peter said they believed in and affirmed the flood.
They did not dispute that Jesus and the new testament say they believe in and affirm:
the genesis stories of Adam and Eve
(also a prefigurement for the way of salvation that will overcome the sin of Adam and Eve and the fall of mankind, Jesus and Mary are the new Adam and Eve in bringing mankind back to salvation to overcome the fall caused by sin),
Noah,
the tower of Babel
(my interpretation just to give you one for thought, but it may not be perfectly correct: their trying to improve themselves in progress or evolving to be above God or eventually like God and not needing God (like some people try to do today) is a sin, and God broke their wrong effort and punished them for it by dividing people from one another and dispersing them, to lower them and humble them again),
Abraham
(including being willing to sacrifice His son which is a prefigurement of the God the Father and Jesus, which david duke also doesn’t like and implies that he rejects this story as being true),
Moses
(also a prefigurement of Jesus and leading to salvation),
and the bible story of Jonah and the fish
(Jesus says it is the main sign of prefiguring of Him dying and being buried and resurrected on the third day).
There are other things of the old testament quoted by or shown to be believed as true by Jesus or the new testament. But I have just given those few as examples.
.
David duke says he knows Christianity or the bible well, or knows the doctrines or interpretations correctly, or will decide his own interpretations that he thinks are most correct.
There are the things he says about Christianity which are incorrect. By the Christian teachings of the Catholic Church, and of all time, and by the bible even for a lay man reading it, or maybe even for non Christians, reading the bible.
I think he has to check the things he chooses for discussion that he says to be true, in the bible, and in Christian teaching of all time, before seeking to be teaching it to others.
.
Does the bible say all children “are (in) the Kingdom of Heaven”, and that david duke implies or explicitly says, all children are going to Heaven just because they are children?
No. The bible doesn’t say children “are the Kingdom of Heaven”, as if being children is identical to the Kingdom of Heaven, or of being assured of being in Heaven.
It says their faith, the faith of children, who wanted to come to him, people who have faith like the faith of these children are those who will have the Kingdom of Heaven, or go to Heaven.
It specifies it is their faith that will save them, it is faith like theirs that will save any person, just as the Christian teaching is that in true faith and obedience you will be saved.
It is not their being children that will save them.
And also notice well, that they want to come to Jesus. Just as with the usual Christian teaching, those who do not want to come to Jesus will not be saved. Because to be in communion in Jesus is the only way to be saved.
Also children may be innocent and not sin when very young, but still in childhood they can sin, for example behaviour against love of others, or lying, stealing, not honouring father and mother.
Original sin is not guilt from ancestors but is an inherited fallen nature which means people will sin. As we know only Jesus and Mary were born without the fallen nature of original sin and lived without sin.
All of mankind has to be saved, or they will not go to Heaven or have eternal life, and will have the eternal condemnation for their sins.
That is why children have to be taught the faith so that they can follow it.
David duke’s teaching that being a child is itself salvation, is false.
Yet he very regularly repeats it.
Multiple times each week.
Instead of devoting effort to repeating teaching things that he has decided on like this about Christianity.
He should sometimes take time and effort to look again and check his ideas.
Check if the bible verses say what he says. Check what the Church and Christianity have taught for all time. And why they teach it. Check what explanation they have surely given.
Do not make new mistakes about Christianity, or repeat old mistakes, which have probably or almost certainly already been corrected.
.
The flood is explicitly used typologically twice in the New Testament.
Jesus, speaking of the final judgment (Matthew 24:36-41), says it will be like “the days of Noah”.
“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were saved through water, and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.
Not only does Saint Peter say the ark and the flood are true.
But he confirms that only those in the ark were saved.
This is why the Catholic Church and Christianity have always taught this.
Only those in the ark are saved.
Saint Peter says this is also a prefigurement for baptism and (true correct) faith, by which in agreement with what God has revealed and taught and commanded, we are saved in communion in Jesus.
And Saint Peter confirms that the people who died were disobedient, while God was patiently waiting for the ark to be built.
This indicates that the people died because they were disobedient in not getting on the ark before the flood, since if it says God was patient it implies that they could have been saved, and that they had the time to be saved before the ark was finished and before the flood came, so they could have been saved by accepting to get on the ark. And they died because they did not get on the ark. And so because they refused God’s offered way of salvation.
Just as today God offers the way of salvation only in Jesus and only in and through the Catholic Church that Jesus has established and which is His body and His bride, and in which mankind who faithfully enter in and remain in it will be saved.
And those who will not enter in it or will not remain in it and or reject it will not be saved and so will die in the justice of judgement for not accepting the only way of salvation God by His choice has given, and so without accepting salvation people will instead be given the justice of their choice, of eternal condemnation, hell and the separation from God and the rejection of eternal life.
.
Similarly some people will argue and judge God or His Catholic Church and His Catholic Christian faith, by being offended and rejecting the truth that people who reject the only true way of salvation in Jesus and in the Catholic Church and in the Catholic Christian faith, will not be saved and will not have eternal life and will not be with God after the judgement and will be in hell and eternal life of eternal condemnation.
And so some people will say I don’t like this. My idea of God is that people don’t go to hell and have eternal condemnation just because they did not accept salvation in the only way Jesus offered to all people.
And so some people will say they choose to believe this is not true, and they will make their idea of God and their idea of truth and their idea of salvation and of faith and of religion.
And they will say their idea is the truth.
And the true established Catholic Church and the true revealed Jesus and the true revealed faith and religion is not true, and they will reject it, and oppose it, and seek to encourage others to do the same and to help them usurp the truth and replace it with their own false man made different and opposing idea and religion.
This is what lucifer did.
.
I saw a good and useful quote yesterday which can give us cause for thought and consideration.
.
“Catholic tradition has it that Lucifer, once the most beautiful angel created by Almighty God, was so enraged at the very notion that God Himself would adopt human (and thus highly inferior to angelic) flesh and be born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a woman.
Ah, that prideful and wretchful angel could not stomach the thought that he, the “angel of light”, would have to worship a God-Man. Eventually, Lucifer’s fateful “non serviam” would plunge himself and all those angels who agreed with him into the fires of hell forever.”
.
Interestingly, on a side note. I had been researching apologetics in answer to muslims the day or two before seeing that quote.
And so the quote made me think of that with islam, and muslims, the main thing that is probably the most important thing that islam says, and exists to declare and promote, is that God did not become incarnate man in flesh.
And the quote of that Catholic tradition says, the reason Lucifer rebelled is because he didn’t like or accept that God was going to become incarnate man in flesh, and that he thought of himself as too much better than human flesh to worship God in human flesh.
The thinking of Lucifer, and the thinking of islam, their revulsion and rejection of the incarnation of God in flesh, and opposition and rebellion against God in flesh. The alikeness of it. Gives you some thought.
.
In the same way, those of mankind who will not accept Jesus as God in flesh and will not accept salvation by faith and obedience in him, and will not worship Jesus as God.
Then they will not have salvation and eternal life with God in Heaven and in His Kingdom on earth, and they will have eternal condemnation.
Do not be like Lucifer. Who wanted to make his own self invented choice of how God and truth and God’s religion and way of life, should be. And rejected God and God’s choice of how things will be.
Do not be prideful and usurp the place of God and of His will.
Do not try to be the better chooser at things than God.
.
All rebellion against God and His will and His true faith and religion, is sin.
And will be judged and condemned.
And will only be forgiven if repented.
Also rebellion often and many times greatly has consequences on earth. As we can all see if we look sincerely and objectively at history.
Such as rebellion and tearing away from the true Church and faith and opposing it, and the consequences on nations and their people and the world, and also the persecution and suffering caused to those who did not rebel by those who did rebel.
.
As for the justice of God killing all of mankind except those who got on the ark, in the flood.
The story of noah and the flood states that the people on earth were wicked. And that it was for their wickedness that they were punished and that God sent the flood to kill them to wipe out their sin and wickedness from the earth and to wipe the earth clean, to start again with the family of those eight people who were faithful and who got on the ark and also built it as we should be cooperating in building God’s Kingdom and the Church and helping it to fulfil its mission and nature of being and giving salvation to all of mankind who will accept it and who will enter in and remain in the new ark of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church Kingdom of God, in communion in Jesus and the Holy Trinity.
.
Jeremy, Patrick, or David Duke himself if he reads it. I hope someone will see to it that this post will be able to be given to David Duke for him to see. Or that someone will discuss it with him so that he can hear what I have written here.
He leads an example not only to himself but for other people who listen to him too.
I missed out two words in the quote about Catholic tradition, I gave.
It should say: “inferior to the angelic nature”.
And I mistakenly wrote: “inferior to angelic”
I want to give the quote correctly.
Here it is corrected:
.
“Catholic tradition has it that Lucifer, once the most beautiful angel created by Almighty God, was so enraged at the very notion that God Himself would adopt human (and thus highly inferior to the angelic nature) flesh and be born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a woman.
Ah, that prideful and wretchful angel could not stomach the thought that he, the “angel of light”, would have to worship a God-Man. Eventually, Lucifer’s fateful “non serviam” would plunge himself and all those angels who agreed with him into the fires of hell forever.”
David duke could make his own fake bible like the jewish talmud, and the muslims, and the jehova’s witnesses and the mormons.
Then he can say his bible is his views and that he rejects what the true bible says because he says he decides what he doesn’t like is not right and he says it must have said something different and was changed.
He can even be the leader of his own created new fake religion.
Then people can stay away from it. And stay in the truth.
.
Most of the time what he says he doesn’t like, doesn’t even say or mean what he says, and he is just thinking of it with a wrong predetermined thinking.
In attacking things in the old testament.
He sounds like richard dawkins and the new atheism of 2006 that died out by 2013 or so.
David duke is decades out of date on fake religion.
Liberalism really made a fake liberal Christian lie in the 1960s and 1970s and it did no good and only did evil and harm for the Church and Christianity and our nations and the world.
That liberalism in the Church has also mostly died by about 2019, even for a lot of the clergy they are realizing and opposing liberalism in the Church now.
The liberal false teachers only remain as having the power, but they don’t have the people.
People left it. The liberal fake Christian activists took the power and the buildings and material property, with the help and power of the world war 2 Satanic anti Christian victor of the usa liberal democracy and communism world tyranny globalism. Forcing the fake lie in the Church.
Very much like the seizing of power and of buildings by protestants in europe in various nations with protestant violent revolution, and persecution of Catholics, and liquidation of over a thousand years of wealth donated and built up by Christians.
.
And david duke sounds like the person he admires, the anti Christian Bart Ehrman who has everything he has and the admiration and livelihood from people by spending all his time for years attacking Christianity and I think he attacks only Christianity.
I don’t think Bart Ehrman attacks jews or judaism. He attacks the old testament but he only attacks Christianity in his attacks on the old testament, he doesn’t attack the old testament as an attack on jews and judaism.
And it is like david duke is reading his book and has it by his bedside and learns and repeats the words and thoughts of anti Christian Bart Ehrman.
And from what I saw of the pattern of Bart Ehrman he is behaving like a jew in his obsessive attack on Christianity in book after book and website.
He is a jew or has the anti Christian jewish spirit. Or keeps the company of jews who give him his thoughts and ideas.
And I wouldn’t be surprised if jews write some or a lot of his thoughts and ideas and books for him.
Especially as jews own all the publishing and promoting and so surely they have helped the work and harmful and negative impact of this anti Christian jew by spirit, and attacker of Christianity.
And yet david duke sees him as a valid expert and teaching authority to learn from about Jesus and Christianity and the Church and the bible. That he is a valid expert authority on teaching about the Christian authority established by Jesus and that Bart Ehrman rejects.
.
Will you learn from enemies of God and Jesus and who reject the authority of the Church and faith that God Jesus established, and will you yourself also reject the authority of the Church and faith God Jesus established?
It is like choosing the jews who rejected Jesus then and in all time and now, instead of choosing Jesus and His Church as the authority of truth and especially the authority about Jesus and the Church and truth.
.
David duke if you want to get more well researched and correct in faith in Christianity at this time in your life. You are going the wrong way about it.
Look for and learn from Christian authority, not its enemies or fake perverters of it. Especially not in modern times when the perversion and fakery has been the worst.
The oldest and longest held beliefs and teaching, and those held everywhere, and those by the true Catholic Church established by Jesus and teaching the same teaching for the whole almost 2000 years, are the best and most reliable.
.
After world war 2, europe, the Church, and the world, were captured, and occupied, and under coercion obviously.
Protestants of since martin luther, or the 250 years old usa, or 100 years of jewish and freemasonic and protestant world domination. Are obviously not the original teachers and teachings of Christianity.
By the way. Martin Luther even admitted in writing that he got a lot of his early ideas of rebellion against the Catholic Church in religion, from jews. And I have seen for the first time recently, that he even gave a name of one of the jews who gave him his ideas.
He regretted listening to them later. And regretted the protestant multiplication of false teachings and false sects and of rebellion.
Some say he converted to Catholic again or received the Catholic last rites on his death bed. Although it can’t be proven.
It could be true I think.
He kept a lot of Catholic beliefs and defended them against other protestants.
.
What is a main thing that david duke argues against?
That God sometimes punishes people in life on earth.
You have a problem with that some people behave so badly that God punishes them in life?
Just look at how the jews behave today! And in all of history!
And you have a problem that God might sometimes choose it is justice to punish people in life?
Are you God, or qualified or have authority of God to judge God’s justice?
.
I have listened to david duke’s 3 shows of 8, 9, 10, december 2025. All are as bad, and he is probably getting worse, about false teaching of religion.
I am a fan of david duke, in his work about the jews.
Not in his false and incorrect and therefore harmful by leading people into error and teaching in opposition against the truth, teaching about Jesus and the Church and Christianity and the bible.
What does jeremy think of david duke’s liberalism views of Christianity?
Such as in his 8 dec 25 show he even indicated that he rejects God killing all of mankind and other life except for those who were on the ark, in the flood:
.
which is a prefigurement and looking forward to in faith, of the Catholic Church Jesus established being the ark through which Jesus saves us and in which we have communion with Him, and that there is salvation only by truly being faithfully and obediently (not rebelliously rejecting it from inside or outside) in the Catholic Church and there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, which is the new ark of salvation, the body of Jesus which carries us, all of the faithful in faith and obedience who are united in communion with Jesus and the Holy Trinity, in salvation in Jesus.
He (david duke) believes that God is his idea of God. And his interpretation of what that idea of God, and of what God is love, is to be.
If he thinks God would not do something, like killing all of mankind and other life except for those on the ark, in the flood, then he thinks his opinion is valid to reject what it says in the bible and what has always been taught by the Catholic Church, and almost all schismatic other Christian churches, and what was written and affirmed and taught by the Church fathers, and what Jesus and Saint Peter affirmed in the new testament.
.
The new testament was written by Christians it was written by the Catholic Church, and the Catholic Church and Christians accepted it and they did not dispute it, and they did not dispute that Jesus and Saint Peter said they believed in and affirmed the flood.
They did not dispute that Jesus and the new testament say they believe in and affirm:
the genesis stories of Adam and Eve
(also a prefigurement for the way of salvation that will overcome the sin of Adam and Eve and the fall of mankind, Jesus and Mary are the new Adam and Eve in bringing mankind back to salvation to overcome the fall caused by sin),
Noah,
the tower of Babel
(my interpretation just to give you one for thought, but it may not be perfectly correct: their trying to improve themselves in progress or evolving to be above God or eventually like God and not needing God (like some people try to do today) is a sin, and God broke their wrong effort and punished them for it by dividing people from one another and dispersing them, to lower them and humble them again),
Abraham
(including being willing to sacrifice His son which is a prefigurement of the God the Father and Jesus, which david duke also doesn’t like and implies that he rejects this story as being true),
Moses
(also a prefigurement of Jesus and leading to salvation),
and the bible story of Jonah and the fish
(Jesus says it is the main sign of prefiguring of Him dying and being buried and resurrected on the third day).
There are other things of the old testament quoted by or shown to be believed as true by Jesus or the new testament. But I have just given those few as examples.
.
David duke says he knows Christianity or the bible well, or knows the doctrines or interpretations correctly, or will decide his own interpretations that he thinks are most correct.
There are the things he says about Christianity which are incorrect. By the Christian teachings of the Catholic Church, and of all time, and by the bible even for a lay man reading it, or maybe even for non Christians, reading the bible.
I think he has to check the things he chooses for discussion that he says to be true, in the bible, and in Christian teaching of all time, before seeking to be teaching it to others.
.
Does the bible say all children “are (in) the Kingdom of Heaven”, and that david duke implies or explicitly says, all children are going to Heaven just because they are children?
No. The bible doesn’t say children “are the Kingdom of Heaven”, as if being children is identical to the Kingdom of Heaven, or of being assured of being in Heaven.
It says their faith, the faith of children, who wanted to come to him, people who have faith like the faith of these children are those who will have the Kingdom of Heaven, or go to Heaven.
It specifies it is their faith that will save them, it is faith like theirs that will save any person, just as the Christian teaching is that in true faith and obedience you will be saved.
It is not their being children that will save them.
And also notice well, that they want to come to Jesus. Just as with the usual Christian teaching, those who do not want to come to Jesus will not be saved. Because to be in communion in Jesus is the only way to be saved.
Also children may be innocent and not sin when very young, but still in childhood they can sin, for example behaviour against love of others, or lying, stealing, not honouring father and mother.
Original sin is not guilt from ancestors but is an inherited fallen nature which means people will sin. As we know only Jesus and Mary were born without the fallen nature of original sin and lived without sin.
All of mankind has to be saved, or they will not go to Heaven or have eternal life, and will have the eternal condemnation for their sins.
That is why children have to be taught the faith so that they can follow it.
David duke’s teaching that being a child is itself salvation, is false.
Yet he very regularly repeats it.
Multiple times each week.
Instead of devoting effort to repeating teaching things that he has decided on like this about Christianity.
He should sometimes take time and effort to look again and check his ideas.
Check if the bible verses say what he says. Check what the Church and Christianity have taught for all time. And why they teach it. Check what explanation they have surely given.
Do not make new mistakes about Christianity, or repeat old mistakes, which have probably or almost certainly already been corrected.
.
The flood is explicitly used typologically twice in the New Testament.
Jesus, speaking of the final judgment (Matthew 24:36-41), says it will be like “the days of Noah”.
“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024%3A36-41&version=NIV
.
1 Peter 3:18-22
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were saved through water, and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at God’s right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%203%3A18-22&version=NIV
.
Not only does Saint Peter say the ark and the flood are true.
But he confirms that only those in the ark were saved.
This is why the Catholic Church and Christianity have always taught this.
Only those in the ark are saved.
Saint Peter says this is also a prefigurement for baptism and (true correct) faith, by which in agreement with what God has revealed and taught and commanded, we are saved in communion in Jesus.
And Saint Peter confirms that the people who died were disobedient, while God was patiently waiting for the ark to be built.
This indicates that the people died because they were disobedient in not getting on the ark before the flood, since if it says God was patient it implies that they could have been saved, and that they had the time to be saved before the ark was finished and before the flood came, so they could have been saved by accepting to get on the ark. And they died because they did not get on the ark. And so because they refused God’s offered way of salvation.
Just as today God offers the way of salvation only in Jesus and only in and through the Catholic Church that Jesus has established and which is His body and His bride, and in which mankind who faithfully enter in and remain in it will be saved.
And those who will not enter in it or will not remain in it and or reject it will not be saved and so will die in the justice of judgement for not accepting the only way of salvation God by His choice has given, and so without accepting salvation people will instead be given the justice of their choice, of eternal condemnation, hell and the separation from God and the rejection of eternal life.
.
Similarly some people will argue and judge God or His Catholic Church and His Catholic Christian faith, by being offended and rejecting the truth that people who reject the only true way of salvation in Jesus and in the Catholic Church and in the Catholic Christian faith, will not be saved and will not have eternal life and will not be with God after the judgement and will be in hell and eternal life of eternal condemnation.
And so some people will say I don’t like this. My idea of God is that people don’t go to hell and have eternal condemnation just because they did not accept salvation in the only way Jesus offered to all people.
And so some people will say they choose to believe this is not true, and they will make their idea of God and their idea of truth and their idea of salvation and of faith and of religion.
And they will say their idea is the truth.
And the true established Catholic Church and the true revealed Jesus and the true revealed faith and religion is not true, and they will reject it, and oppose it, and seek to encourage others to do the same and to help them usurp the truth and replace it with their own false man made different and opposing idea and religion.
This is what lucifer did.
.
I saw a good and useful quote yesterday which can give us cause for thought and consideration.
.
“Catholic tradition has it that Lucifer, once the most beautiful angel created by Almighty God, was so enraged at the very notion that God Himself would adopt human (and thus highly inferior to angelic) flesh and be born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a woman.
Ah, that prideful and wretchful angel could not stomach the thought that he, the “angel of light”, would have to worship a God-Man. Eventually, Lucifer’s fateful “non serviam” would plunge himself and all those angels who agreed with him into the fires of hell forever.”
.
Interestingly, on a side note. I had been researching apologetics in answer to muslims the day or two before seeing that quote.
And so the quote made me think of that with islam, and muslims, the main thing that is probably the most important thing that islam says, and exists to declare and promote, is that God did not become incarnate man in flesh.
And the quote of that Catholic tradition says, the reason Lucifer rebelled is because he didn’t like or accept that God was going to become incarnate man in flesh, and that he thought of himself as too much better than human flesh to worship God in human flesh.
The thinking of Lucifer, and the thinking of islam, their revulsion and rejection of the incarnation of God in flesh, and opposition and rebellion against God in flesh. The alikeness of it. Gives you some thought.
.
In the same way, those of mankind who will not accept Jesus as God in flesh and will not accept salvation by faith and obedience in him, and will not worship Jesus as God.
Then they will not have salvation and eternal life with God in Heaven and in His Kingdom on earth, and they will have eternal condemnation.
Do not be like Lucifer. Who wanted to make his own self invented choice of how God and truth and God’s religion and way of life, should be. And rejected God and God’s choice of how things will be.
Do not be prideful and usurp the place of God and of His will.
Do not try to be the better chooser at things than God.
.
All rebellion against God and His will and His true faith and religion, is sin.
And will be judged and condemned.
And will only be forgiven if repented.
Also rebellion often and many times greatly has consequences on earth. As we can all see if we look sincerely and objectively at history.
Such as rebellion and tearing away from the true Church and faith and opposing it, and the consequences on nations and their people and the world, and also the persecution and suffering caused to those who did not rebel by those who did rebel.
.
As for the justice of God killing all of mankind except those who got on the ark, in the flood.
The story of noah and the flood states that the people on earth were wicked. And that it was for their wickedness that they were punished and that God sent the flood to kill them to wipe out their sin and wickedness from the earth and to wipe the earth clean, to start again with the family of those eight people who were faithful and who got on the ark and also built it as we should be cooperating in building God’s Kingdom and the Church and helping it to fulfil its mission and nature of being and giving salvation to all of mankind who will accept it and who will enter in and remain in the new ark of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church Kingdom of God, in communion in Jesus and the Holy Trinity.
.
Jeremy, Patrick, or David Duke himself if he reads it. I hope someone will see to it that this post will be able to be given to David Duke for him to see. Or that someone will discuss it with him so that he can hear what I have written here.
He leads an example not only to himself but for other people who listen to him too.
.
Thank you.
.
God bless us.
I missed out two words in the quote about Catholic tradition, I gave.
It should say: “inferior to the angelic nature”.
And I mistakenly wrote: “inferior to angelic”
I want to give the quote correctly.
Here it is corrected:
.
“Catholic tradition has it that Lucifer, once the most beautiful angel created by Almighty God, was so enraged at the very notion that God Himself would adopt human (and thus highly inferior to the angelic nature) flesh and be born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, a woman.
Ah, that prideful and wretchful angel could not stomach the thought that he, the “angel of light”, would have to worship a God-Man. Eventually, Lucifer’s fateful “non serviam” would plunge himself and all those angels who agreed with him into the fires of hell forever.”
Correction:
The quote should say: “wretched”.
Instead of: “wretchful”
David duke could make his own fake bible like the jewish talmud, and the muslims, and the jehova’s witnesses and the mormons.
Then he can say his bible is his views and that he rejects what the true bible says because he says he decides what he doesn’t like is not right and he says it must have said something different and was changed.
He can even be the leader of his own created new fake religion.
Then people can stay away from it. And stay in the truth.
.
Most of the time what he says he doesn’t like, doesn’t even say or mean what he says, and he is just thinking of it with a wrong predetermined thinking.
In attacking things in the old testament.
He sounds like richard dawkins and the new atheism of 2006 that died out by 2013 or so.
David duke is decades out of date on fake religion.
Liberalism really made a fake liberal Christian lie in the 1960s and 1970s and it did no good and only did evil and harm for the Church and Christianity and our nations and the world.
That liberalism in the Church has also mostly died by about 2019, even for a lot of the clergy they are realizing and opposing liberalism in the Church now.
The liberal false teachers only remain as having the power, but they don’t have the people.
People left it. The liberal fake Christian activists took the power and the buildings and material property, with the help and power of the world war 2 Satanic anti Christian victor of the usa liberal democracy and communism world tyranny globalism. Forcing the fake lie in the Church.
Very much like the seizing of power and of buildings by protestants in europe in various nations with protestant violent revolution, and persecution of Catholics, and liquidation of over a thousand years of wealth donated and built up by Christians.
.
And david duke sounds like the person he admires, the anti Christian Bart Ehrman who has everything he has and the admiration and livelihood from people by spending all his time for years attacking Christianity and I think he attacks only Christianity.
I don’t think Bart Ehrman attacks jews or judaism. He attacks the old testament but he only attacks Christianity in his attacks on the old testament, he doesn’t attack the old testament as an attack on jews and judaism.
And it is like david duke is reading his book and has it by his bedside and learns and repeats the words and thoughts of anti Christian Bart Ehrman.
And from what I saw of the pattern of Bart Ehrman he is behaving like a jew in his obsessive attack on Christianity in book after book and website.
He is a jew or has the anti Christian jewish spirit. Or keeps the company of jews who give him his thoughts and ideas.
And I wouldn’t be surprised if jews write some or a lot of his thoughts and ideas and books for him.
Especially as jews own all the publishing and promoting and so surely they have helped the work and harmful and negative impact of this anti Christian jew by spirit, and attacker of Christianity.
And yet david duke sees him as a valid expert and teaching authority to learn from about Jesus and Christianity and the Church and the bible. That he is a valid expert authority on teaching about the Christian authority established by Jesus and that Bart Ehrman rejects.
.
Will you learn from enemies of God and Jesus and who reject the authority of the Church and faith that God Jesus established, and will you yourself also reject the authority of the Church and faith God Jesus established?
It is like choosing the jews who rejected Jesus then and in all time and now, instead of choosing Jesus and His Church as the authority of truth and especially the authority about Jesus and the Church and truth.
.
David duke if you want to get more well researched and correct in faith in Christianity at this time in your life. You are going the wrong way about it.
Look for and learn from Christian authority, not its enemies or fake perverters of it. Especially not in modern times when the perversion and fakery has been the worst.
The oldest and longest held beliefs and teaching, and those held everywhere, and those by the true Catholic Church established by Jesus and teaching the same teaching for the whole almost 2000 years, are the best and most reliable.
.
After world war 2, europe, the Church, and the world, were captured, and occupied, and under coercion obviously.
Protestants of since martin luther, or the 250 years old usa, or 100 years of jewish and freemasonic and protestant world domination. Are obviously not the original teachers and teachings of Christianity.
By the way. Martin Luther even admitted in writing that he got a lot of his early ideas of rebellion against the Catholic Church in religion, from jews. And I have seen for the first time recently, that he even gave a name of one of the jews who gave him his ideas.
He regretted listening to them later. And regretted the protestant multiplication of false teachings and false sects and of rebellion.
Some say he converted to Catholic again or received the Catholic last rites on his death bed. Although it can’t be proven.
It could be true I think.
He kept a lot of Catholic beliefs and defended them against other protestants.
.
What is a main thing that david duke argues against?
That God sometimes punishes people in life on earth.
You have a problem with that some people behave so badly that God punishes them in life?
Just look at how the jews behave today! And in all of history!
And you have a problem that God might sometimes choose it is justice to punish people in life?
Are you God, or qualified or have authority of God to judge God’s justice?
.
I have listened to david duke’s 3 shows of 8, 9, 10, december 2025. All are as bad, and he is probably getting worse, about false teaching of religion.
I am a fan of david duke, in his work about the jews.
Not in his false and incorrect and therefore harmful by leading people into error and teaching in opposition against the truth, teaching about Jesus and the Church and Christianity and the bible.