I disagree with fetzer’s constant proclamations that the moon landing was faked or a hoax.
The biggest obstacle these moon landing deniers keep bringing up is the van allen radiation belt. Yes, this was an obstacle and a big risk, but it was a risk we took that ended up paying off in the end. The outer hull of the shuttle was fitted with gold plating to reflect the dangerous radiation of the belt.
Think about this: if the moon landing was fake, doesn’t anyone realize that Russia, our biggest adversary at the time, would have called it out as being fraudulent? They would have chomped at the bits to embarrass the United States like that at the time. But they did not do so, because they couldn’t.
Also, a high powered telescope can be used to spot the American flag still planted on the moon to this day.
To deny our moon landing would be to deny the genius and creativity of all the intelligent white people who worked on the Apollo mission.
“The outer hull of the shuttle was fitted with gold plating to reflect the dangerous radiation of the belt.”
A plating of gold would not block the radiation. It would require more than a foot of lead shielding.
In this century, NASA stated that before we can go “back” to the moon, we have to find a way to protect the astronauts from the radiation of the Van Allen Belts. Why? You claim that astronauts already went through the belts 14 times. Just do it the same way you did before.
The camera that was allegedly used on the moon had no lead shielding whatsoever. All of the pictures would have been ruined by radiation.
“a high powered telescope can be used to spot the American flag still planted on the moon to this day.”
No, it can’t.
“To deny our moon landing would be to deny the genius and creativity of all the intelligent white people who worked on the Apollo mission.”
To deny that we’ve been to Mars and even to other solar systems (maybe even other galaxies!) would be to deny the genius of those who worked on the movies 2001: A Space Odyssey, Forbidden Planet, and so on.
Some of the Apollo disciples think that Werner von Braun designed the Saturn V rocket. He didn’t. Rudolph headed the team that designed that mediocre rocket (which was dumped as soon as the Apollo farce ended).
NASA has said in this century that to go “back” to the moon, a much larger rocket will be needed (“Saturn V on steroids”). Why? Has the earth’s gravity increased that much?
So NASA has indirectly confessed that we never went to the moon.
Since the moon has no atmosphere, the astronots should have been able to take absolutely stunning photographs of the stars. They didn’t take even one. Why? They were not on the moon.
Actions speak louder than words. Armstrong himself proclaimed that he never went to the moon. He did that by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon. By so doing he turned down $5000.
The lens of the camera used by Aldrin and Armstrong was made so that several cross-hairs or reticles would be superimposed on every photograph. The cross-hair in the center was larger than the others. In one of the pictures, the largest cross-hair was clearly not in the center of the photograph.
It is evident that fill-in lights were used for some of the pictures. Any expert photographer will tell you that. Even the Swedish designer of the camera that was used says that he cannot explain how those pictures could have been made without a fill-in light. And yet NASA says that no fill-in lights were used.
Many of the “moon photos” show shadows on the ground that are not parallel. This means that the light source was not the sun. Sunlight produces on a relatively flat, level surface shadows that are parallel.
Let’s try to imagine what it would be like if one could actually travel to the moon and land a rocket-propelled craft on the surface.
You are at the controls; the roar of the rocket engine is deafening (140 decibels or more), so you cannot hear anybody or speak to anybody. As the craft approaches the surface, the powerful exhaust plume of the engine kicks up a massive amount of dust, completely obscuring your view of the surface. Looking at your instruments, you try to control the attitude of the craft and set it down gently enough on the surface. You hope that the crater dug by the exhaust won’t be so large that the landing pads will wind up in the crater and not on the undisturbed surface of the moon.
But what did NASA actually show us? They showed us that the rocket engine was completely silent and that one of the astronots actually said (as scripted), “Quiet ride.” They showed us that after the craft “landed”, the surface under it was absolutely undisturbed and there was not a single speck of dirt or dust on the landing pads. Following his script, one of the astronots in one of the “missions” actually said, “Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”
Although the astronauts allegedly left innumerable footprints on the moon, although NASA presented videos of the wheels of “lunar rovers” throwing dust into the air, not one of the six alleged “lunar landers” created a blast crater when it allegedly landed. Not one of the six alleged landers created a depression or disturbed the surface in any way whatsoever with its exhaust jet. Although these rockets allegedly had a thrust measured in thousands of pounds, they were unable even to melt or char the moon’s surface. No dust settled on any of the landing pads of the six alleged landers.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t land; they were carried to their locations here on earth.
The video footage allegedly showing the blast-off of the “lunar lander” after the “moon landing” was over shows absolutely no exhaust plume. There should have been a massive, opaque plume.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t blast off on the moon; they were lifted up here on earth.
One of NASA’s “moon photos” shows several footprints made by the astronots’ boots. However, it also shows part of a footprint made by a tennis shoe. Therefore, we know that the photograph was not taken on the moon. NASA lied about that, and so we have to assume that they lied about everything else.
During a space-shuttle flight that went higher than its predecessors (although it was far below the Van Allen Belts), the astronauts said that they could see sparks caused by radiation with their eyes shut. CNN reported that this flight revealed that the radiation belts are more dangerous than previously believed. How could that shuttle flight provide any information about the Van Allen Belts that had not already been provided by the seven Apollo flights that allegedly went through those belts? That seems impossible. What does seem possible, even certain, is that Apollo was just another of ZOG’s lies.
We have two video clips that slipped through NASA’s fingers. They both show Apollo astronauts in low orbit around the earth pretending to be halfway to the moon. In one, they darkened the interior of the craft, moved several feet away from a round window that was filled by a view of the earth’s surface, and pointed the camera at the window. The dark interior of the craft surrounding the window was supposed to be the blackness of space surrounding the distant earth.
Why did they ever have to pretend that they were halfway to the moon? Because they were never halfway to the moon. The whole thing was a hoax.
The day after Grissom and 2 other astronauts were burned to death by the satanic System, FBI thugs entered Grissom’s home and stole the reports about Apollo that he had written; those reports were never returned to his widow.
NASA inspector Thomas Ronald Baron, who had written a 500-page report detailing the incompetence of NASA and North American Aviation, testified before the congressional committee that was investigating the disaster (Grissom’s murder by immolation). Four days later, he, his wife, and his daughter were allegedly killed when his automobile was struck by a train. (They were almost certainly dead before the train struck their car.) In violation of Florida law, not one of them was autopsied. His 500-page report disappeared.
Why did the satanic System murder Thomas Ronald Baron, his wife, and even his little girl? The satanic System murdered them to protect the lie.
Bill Wood: “The LEM proposal was amazingly short. This was a 110-page document where Gruman proposed the entire LEM program, which was a 6.9 billion dollar program, and that’s an outrageously small document for anyone to submit and ask for 6.9 billion dollars. There’s no way that a reviewer could determine whether or not the contractor is going to accomplish anything worthwhile based on 110 pages of documentation for that size program. When I checked into 10 other programs of similar size like the C5A and large submarine orders or aircraft carrier orders—this type of thing—all of the proposals were between 5,000 pages and 86,000 pages with an average of 38,000 pages, and yet we see this one standing there all by itself with 110 pages.
“And it appeared … that this may have been a situation where they knew that if anyone checked, someone would say, ‘Well, in order to win this you had to submit a proposal, right? So let me see the proposal.’ So they had to produce a proposal, but they didn’t go to the trouble of producing one of decent length. A 110-page proposal is about appropriate for a 1.4 million dollar program, which is 5000 times smaller than the claimed LEM program. Now, you wouldn’t need a very long proposal if you weren’t really going to build a LEM that had to work.”
Bill Kaysing: “Apollos 1 through 6 were all failures, dreadful failures. They blew up on the pad, they blew up 50 feet in the air. Apollo 6, the last one in which I think we had truthful data, was a total fiasco. It took off; second stage didn’t ignite; everything went wrong that could go wrong…. From Apollo 7 on, they decided to falsify information, and that’s what they did.”
Bill Kaysing: “In 1959, I was working with advanced research at Rocketdyne, and their own studies proved that radiation levels on the moon were lethal. This corroborated Russian research. The Russians claimed that for a man to survive on the moon with the radiation emitted from solar and cosmic sources, he would have to be shielded by four feet of solid lead.”
Professor James A. Van Allen: “The acceptance of such grandiose proposals by otherwise rational individuals stems from the mystique of space flight, as nurtured over many centuries by early writers of science fiction and their present-day counterparts. Indeed, to the ordinary person space flight is synonymous with the flight of human beings. The simple taste for adventure and fantasy expressed in that sentiment has been elevated in some quarters to the quasi-religious belief that space is a natural habitat of human beings.”
Did you hear what the discoverer of the Van Allen Radiation Belts said? The idea of sending men to the moon is a “grandiose” “fantasy”.
Here’s the slogan that the Apollo believers proudly recite when they are thinking, all starry-eyed, about ZOG:
“How can such a gnat as I
Question such a mighty fly?”
The know that men cavorted on the moon because that’s what ZOG told them!
The idea of having to think for themselves and decide what is true and what is false terrifies them. They desperately need a master who tells them what to believe.
Frankly, I have unbridled contempt for those who need to trust and believe and obey something as alien and monstrous as ZOG.
Yeah, I don’t buy a lot of that. We went to the moon in ’69. In correct context, Armstrong did not mean that we never went to the moon when he was speaking to a child at that time. Really, if there was a conspiracy as vast as the Apollo mission, you’d think you’d have a couple whistleblowers to blow the lid on the operation, but none ever came forward.
The “holocaust” hoax and the moon landing are two very different subjects. The former has ample evidence of forensic scientists who visited those so-called “death camps” after the war, and they presented real evidence in the face of a mountain of hearsay from supposed survivors and mass media manipulation.
You forgot to address why the Soviet union would not seize at the opportunity to call us out on our fraud if the moon landing was faked. They had an equally impressive staff of German scientists carried over from WW2 Germany working on their space program. Surely they would have known the impossibility of going to the moon? But nothing was said. That would of been the perfect moment by our chief adversary at the time to humiliate us!
I don’t think moon landing deniers are evil btw. They have their opinion on the matter which they are free to believe in. They’re nothing like flat earth believers who are just plain nutty. But I do think it’s a distraction from more important things… Hey, if it’s any consolation, when this government eventually collapses, our future descendants can raid NASA hq and finally discover the truth!
One of the callers said that Elon Musk’s father said that the Apollo astronauts did not go to the moon. Fetzer, of course, agreed.
I wonder why nobody at RBN is talking about the fact that they are supposedly going back to the moon today (April 1, 2026)? They say they are not going to land on the moon.
Maybe it’s merely an April Fools joke.
You know more than they know.
You know that, because of the levels of radiation on the moon, the camera that is used must be shielded with lead.
You know that, because of the extremely high levels of radiation in the Van Allen Belts, astronauts passing through them must be protected by a very thick lead shield.
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft lands on the moon, the exhaust will dig a crater and the landing pads will be covered with dust and debris. (“Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”)
You know this about the photographs allegedly taken by astronauts on the moon that show that the surface under the exhaust nozzle of the “lunar lander” is flat and undisturbed and that there is no dirt, dust, or debris on any of the landing pads: those photos actually tend to prove that astronauts didn’t land on the moon.
You know that, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sight of the stars from its surface would be absolutely stunning and breath-taking. (Reporter: “When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars … ?” Neil Armstrong: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface….”)
You know that when you take photographs on the moon, the shadows on the ground will be parallel.
You know that if you’re on the moon photographing the front side of a man and the sun is behind him, the front of the man will not be illuminated.
You know that if a camera is designed to place the largest of the reticles (cross hairs) at the center of the photograph, then the largest reticle will be at the exact center of every photograph taken by that camera.
You know that if a camera is designed to put several cross hairs on each photograph, it would be impossible for one of the cross hairs to be partially obscured by an object in the photograph.
You know that if you drive a golf ball off a tee on the moon, the ball won’t be sliced. (In a vacuum, the ball can’t curve.)
You know that an “astronaut cavorting on the moon” was slyly laughing at us when he proclaimed, “It’s absolutely unreal!”
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft blasts off from the lunar surface, there will be a very large, very visible, opaque exhaust plume.
You know that if you give a rock from the moon to the Dutch prime minister, it won’t turn out to be petrified wood.
You know why the mediocre Saturn V rocket was dumped as soon as the Apollo program ended.
You know why Armstrong turned down $5000 by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon.
You know why ZOG napalmed a radio station’s transmitter that was broadcasting an interview with the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know why Apollo astronaut James Irwin suddenly died just before he was going to talk to the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know more than they.
This may be the most powerful video about Apollo because it contains the best clips from the best videos and interviews about the moon-landing hoax:
I’ll take a look at video, I promise. I didn’t mean to sound arrogant in my above replies but I was unfortunately in a foul mood due to something unrelated.
I disagree with fetzer’s constant proclamations that the moon landing was faked or a hoax.
The biggest obstacle these moon landing deniers keep bringing up is the van allen radiation belt. Yes, this was an obstacle and a big risk, but it was a risk we took that ended up paying off in the end. The outer hull of the shuttle was fitted with gold plating to reflect the dangerous radiation of the belt.
Think about this: if the moon landing was fake, doesn’t anyone realize that Russia, our biggest adversary at the time, would have called it out as being fraudulent? They would have chomped at the bits to embarrass the United States like that at the time. But they did not do so, because they couldn’t.
Also, a high powered telescope can be used to spot the American flag still planted on the moon to this day.
To deny our moon landing would be to deny the genius and creativity of all the intelligent white people who worked on the Apollo mission.
“moon landing deniers”
Are they almost as evil as “Holocaust deniers”?
“The outer hull of the shuttle was fitted with gold plating to reflect the dangerous radiation of the belt.”
A plating of gold would not block the radiation. It would require more than a foot of lead shielding.
In this century, NASA stated that before we can go “back” to the moon, we have to find a way to protect the astronauts from the radiation of the Van Allen Belts. Why? You claim that astronauts already went through the belts 14 times. Just do it the same way you did before.
The camera that was allegedly used on the moon had no lead shielding whatsoever. All of the pictures would have been ruined by radiation.
“a high powered telescope can be used to spot the American flag still planted on the moon to this day.”
No, it can’t.
“To deny our moon landing would be to deny the genius and creativity of all the intelligent white people who worked on the Apollo mission.”
To deny that we’ve been to Mars and even to other solar systems (maybe even other galaxies!) would be to deny the genius of those who worked on the movies 2001: A Space Odyssey, Forbidden Planet, and so on.
Some of the Apollo disciples think that Werner von Braun designed the Saturn V rocket. He didn’t. Rudolph headed the team that designed that mediocre rocket (which was dumped as soon as the Apollo farce ended).
NASA has said in this century that to go “back” to the moon, a much larger rocket will be needed (“Saturn V on steroids”). Why? Has the earth’s gravity increased that much?
So NASA has indirectly confessed that we never went to the moon.
Since the moon has no atmosphere, the astronots should have been able to take absolutely stunning photographs of the stars. They didn’t take even one. Why? They were not on the moon.
Actions speak louder than words. Armstrong himself proclaimed that he never went to the moon. He did that by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon. By so doing he turned down $5000.
The lens of the camera used by Aldrin and Armstrong was made so that several cross-hairs or reticles would be superimposed on every photograph. The cross-hair in the center was larger than the others. In one of the pictures, the largest cross-hair was clearly not in the center of the photograph.
It is evident that fill-in lights were used for some of the pictures. Any expert photographer will tell you that. Even the Swedish designer of the camera that was used says that he cannot explain how those pictures could have been made without a fill-in light. And yet NASA says that no fill-in lights were used.
Many of the “moon photos” show shadows on the ground that are not parallel. This means that the light source was not the sun. Sunlight produces on a relatively flat, level surface shadows that are parallel.
Let’s try to imagine what it would be like if one could actually travel to the moon and land a rocket-propelled craft on the surface.
You are at the controls; the roar of the rocket engine is deafening (140 decibels or more), so you cannot hear anybody or speak to anybody. As the craft approaches the surface, the powerful exhaust plume of the engine kicks up a massive amount of dust, completely obscuring your view of the surface. Looking at your instruments, you try to control the attitude of the craft and set it down gently enough on the surface. You hope that the crater dug by the exhaust won’t be so large that the landing pads will wind up in the crater and not on the undisturbed surface of the moon.
But what did NASA actually show us? They showed us that the rocket engine was completely silent and that one of the astronots actually said (as scripted), “Quiet ride.” They showed us that after the craft “landed”, the surface under it was absolutely undisturbed and there was not a single speck of dirt or dust on the landing pads. Following his script, one of the astronots in one of the “missions” actually said, “Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”
Although the astronauts allegedly left innumerable footprints on the moon, although NASA presented videos of the wheels of “lunar rovers” throwing dust into the air, not one of the six alleged “lunar landers” created a blast crater when it allegedly landed. Not one of the six alleged landers created a depression or disturbed the surface in any way whatsoever with its exhaust jet. Although these rockets allegedly had a thrust measured in thousands of pounds, they were unable even to melt or char the moon’s surface. No dust settled on any of the landing pads of the six alleged landers.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t land; they were carried to their locations here on earth.
The video footage allegedly showing the blast-off of the “lunar lander” after the “moon landing” was over shows absolutely no exhaust plume. There should have been a massive, opaque plume.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t blast off on the moon; they were lifted up here on earth.
One of NASA’s “moon photos” shows several footprints made by the astronots’ boots. However, it also shows part of a footprint made by a tennis shoe. Therefore, we know that the photograph was not taken on the moon. NASA lied about that, and so we have to assume that they lied about everything else.
During a space-shuttle flight that went higher than its predecessors (although it was far below the Van Allen Belts), the astronauts said that they could see sparks caused by radiation with their eyes shut. CNN reported that this flight revealed that the radiation belts are more dangerous than previously believed. How could that shuttle flight provide any information about the Van Allen Belts that had not already been provided by the seven Apollo flights that allegedly went through those belts? That seems impossible. What does seem possible, even certain, is that Apollo was just another of ZOG’s lies.
We have two video clips that slipped through NASA’s fingers. They both show Apollo astronauts in low orbit around the earth pretending to be halfway to the moon. In one, they darkened the interior of the craft, moved several feet away from a round window that was filled by a view of the earth’s surface, and pointed the camera at the window. The dark interior of the craft surrounding the window was supposed to be the blackness of space surrounding the distant earth.
Why did they ever have to pretend that they were halfway to the moon? Because they were never halfway to the moon. The whole thing was a hoax.
The day after Grissom and 2 other astronauts were burned to death by the satanic System, FBI thugs entered Grissom’s home and stole the reports about Apollo that he had written; those reports were never returned to his widow.
NASA inspector Thomas Ronald Baron, who had written a 500-page report detailing the incompetence of NASA and North American Aviation, testified before the congressional committee that was investigating the disaster (Grissom’s murder by immolation). Four days later, he, his wife, and his daughter were allegedly killed when his automobile was struck by a train. (They were almost certainly dead before the train struck their car.) In violation of Florida law, not one of them was autopsied. His 500-page report disappeared.
Why did the satanic System murder Thomas Ronald Baron, his wife, and even his little girl? The satanic System murdered them to protect the lie.
Bill Wood: “The LEM proposal was amazingly short. This was a 110-page document where Gruman proposed the entire LEM program, which was a 6.9 billion dollar program, and that’s an outrageously small document for anyone to submit and ask for 6.9 billion dollars. There’s no way that a reviewer could determine whether or not the contractor is going to accomplish anything worthwhile based on 110 pages of documentation for that size program. When I checked into 10 other programs of similar size like the C5A and large submarine orders or aircraft carrier orders—this type of thing—all of the proposals were between 5,000 pages and 86,000 pages with an average of 38,000 pages, and yet we see this one standing there all by itself with 110 pages.
“And it appeared … that this may have been a situation where they knew that if anyone checked, someone would say, ‘Well, in order to win this you had to submit a proposal, right? So let me see the proposal.’ So they had to produce a proposal, but they didn’t go to the trouble of producing one of decent length. A 110-page proposal is about appropriate for a 1.4 million dollar program, which is 5000 times smaller than the claimed LEM program. Now, you wouldn’t need a very long proposal if you weren’t really going to build a LEM that had to work.”
Bill Kaysing: “Apollos 1 through 6 were all failures, dreadful failures. They blew up on the pad, they blew up 50 feet in the air. Apollo 6, the last one in which I think we had truthful data, was a total fiasco. It took off; second stage didn’t ignite; everything went wrong that could go wrong…. From Apollo 7 on, they decided to falsify information, and that’s what they did.”
Bill Kaysing: “In 1959, I was working with advanced research at Rocketdyne, and their own studies proved that radiation levels on the moon were lethal. This corroborated Russian research. The Russians claimed that for a man to survive on the moon with the radiation emitted from solar and cosmic sources, he would have to be shielded by four feet of solid lead.”
Professor James A. Van Allen: “The acceptance of such grandiose proposals by otherwise rational individuals stems from the mystique of space flight, as nurtured over many centuries by early writers of science fiction and their present-day counterparts. Indeed, to the ordinary person space flight is synonymous with the flight of human beings. The simple taste for adventure and fantasy expressed in that sentiment has been elevated in some quarters to the quasi-religious belief that space is a natural habitat of human beings.”
Did you hear what the discoverer of the Van Allen Radiation Belts said? The idea of sending men to the moon is a “grandiose” “fantasy”.
Here’s the slogan that the Apollo believers proudly recite when they are thinking, all starry-eyed, about ZOG:
“How can such a gnat as I
Question such a mighty fly?”
The know that men cavorted on the moon because that’s what ZOG told them!
The idea of having to think for themselves and decide what is true and what is false terrifies them. They desperately need a master who tells them what to believe.
Frankly, I have unbridled contempt for those who need to trust and believe and obey something as alien and monstrous as ZOG.
“The American public has gradually gained awareness that everything government at any level tells them is a lie.” (Paul Craig Roberts; http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/12/03/rising-death-rates-and-health-injuries-from-covid-vax-can-no-longer-be-covered-up)
Yeah, I don’t buy a lot of that. We went to the moon in ’69. In correct context, Armstrong did not mean that we never went to the moon when he was speaking to a child at that time. Really, if there was a conspiracy as vast as the Apollo mission, you’d think you’d have a couple whistleblowers to blow the lid on the operation, but none ever came forward.
The “holocaust” hoax and the moon landing are two very different subjects. The former has ample evidence of forensic scientists who visited those so-called “death camps” after the war, and they presented real evidence in the face of a mountain of hearsay from supposed survivors and mass media manipulation.
You forgot to address why the Soviet union would not seize at the opportunity to call us out on our fraud if the moon landing was faked. They had an equally impressive staff of German scientists carried over from WW2 Germany working on their space program. Surely they would have known the impossibility of going to the moon? But nothing was said. That would of been the perfect moment by our chief adversary at the time to humiliate us!
I don’t think moon landing deniers are evil btw. They have their opinion on the matter which they are free to believe in. They’re nothing like flat earth believers who are just plain nutty. But I do think it’s a distraction from more important things… Hey, if it’s any consolation, when this government eventually collapses, our future descendants can raid NASA hq and finally discover the truth!
One of the callers said that Elon Musk’s father said that the Apollo astronauts did not go to the moon. Fetzer, of course, agreed.
I wonder why nobody at RBN is talking about the fact that they are supposedly going back to the moon today (April 1, 2026)? They say they are not going to land on the moon.
Maybe it’s merely an April Fools joke.
You know more than they know.
You know that, because of the levels of radiation on the moon, the camera that is used must be shielded with lead.
You know that, because of the extremely high levels of radiation in the Van Allen Belts, astronauts passing through them must be protected by a very thick lead shield.
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft lands on the moon, the exhaust will dig a crater and the landing pads will be covered with dust and debris. (“Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”)
You know this about the photographs allegedly taken by astronauts on the moon that show that the surface under the exhaust nozzle of the “lunar lander” is flat and undisturbed and that there is no dirt, dust, or debris on any of the landing pads: those photos actually tend to prove that astronauts didn’t land on the moon.
You know that, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sight of the stars from its surface would be absolutely stunning and breath-taking. (Reporter: “When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars … ?” Neil Armstrong: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface….”)
You know that when you take photographs on the moon, the shadows on the ground will be parallel.
You know that if you’re on the moon photographing the front side of a man and the sun is behind him, the front of the man will not be illuminated.
You know that if a camera is designed to place the largest of the reticles (cross hairs) at the center of the photograph, then the largest reticle will be at the exact center of every photograph taken by that camera.
You know that if a camera is designed to put several cross hairs on each photograph, it would be impossible for one of the cross hairs to be partially obscured by an object in the photograph.
You know that if you drive a golf ball off a tee on the moon, the ball won’t be sliced. (In a vacuum, the ball can’t curve.)
You know that an “astronaut cavorting on the moon” was slyly laughing at us when he proclaimed, “It’s absolutely unreal!”
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft blasts off from the lunar surface, there will be a very large, very visible, opaque exhaust plume.
You know that if you give a rock from the moon to the Dutch prime minister, it won’t turn out to be petrified wood.
You know why the mediocre Saturn V rocket was dumped as soon as the Apollo program ended.
You know why Armstrong turned down $5000 by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon.
You know why ZOG napalmed a radio station’s transmitter that was broadcasting an interview with the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know why Apollo astronaut James Irwin suddenly died just before he was going to talk to the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know more than they.
This may be the most powerful video about Apollo because it contains the best clips from the best videos and interviews about the moon-landing hoax:
http://archive.org/details/Apollo_Moon_Hoax
I’ll take a look at video, I promise. I didn’t mean to sound arrogant in my above replies but I was unfortunately in a foul mood due to something unrelated.
I’ll get back to you.
I’d like to know now why Jim Fetzer is only doing shows three times a week? Why were we not told this when Jim mentioned it?
I don’t know but perhaps he needs a break from broadcasting everyday. It’s a lot of hard work to do 15 hours of radio each week.