The false-flag attack on 2001-09-11 was discussed.
Ted Gunderson (formerly head of the F.B.I. in southern California):
“There’s no question about who was responsible for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Through their informant … (the F.B.I. informant …) they had control of whether or not to place a dummy bomb or a real bomb there. They placed a real bomb, and the reason they did was to pass the anti-terrorism legislation. There were only six people killed—not enough to pass the legislation…. (So then in 1995 we had the Alfred Murrah Building in Oklahoma City—168 people killed—and then a year later they passed the anti-terrorism legislation.) But I’m telling you that the F.B.I. knew about this, they had control of it, and did nothing to stop it….
“He [the informant] told the F.B.I. in advance that they were going to bomb it…. He was given the assignment to put the bomb together. And he went to his supervisor, his F.B.I. supervisor, and he said, ‘We’re going to put a dummy bomb in here, right?’ Then the F.B.I. supervisor said, ‘No, we’re going to put a real bomb.’ …
“Back in … the 1980s, the Department of Justice proposed legislation to ‘fight terrorism’, and this legislation took away many of our constitutional rights and civil liberties. One of the authors, a female attorney with the Department of Justice, publicly … made this statement … that before this passes people will have to be killed….
“That was the reason, I feel, for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing…. And now with the Twin Towers World Trade Center episode [in 2001], our Congress is now proposing further restrictions on our constitutional rights and civil liberties…. And that’s why our intelligence people not only knew about it in advance but probably [were] involved. There’s no question; you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Again:
“you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Paul Craig Roberts (americanfreepress.net/911-destroyed-america):
“As there is no doubt whatsoever that Building 7 was wired for demolition, the question is why?”
“Only an uneducated and ignorant public can believe the official 9/11 story. The U.S. population fits this description.”
In May 2002, FEMA released its report on the collapse of the buildings. We read: “The specifics of the fires in Building 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”
Experts who watched videos of the collapse of Building 7 say that the building had definitely been prepared for demolition by professionals.
Silverstein explained why it was decided to “pull” (demolish) Building 7: “I said ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.”
Why had Building 7 already been prepared for demolition? Why was it possible to “pull” the building on the spur of the moment?
The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.)
A flight instructor at the school where he was pretending to learn to fly an airplane said: “I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”
The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were nine feet in diameter and largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.
Where an airplane crashes, airplane wreckage is found. When you find the airplane wreckage, you’ve found where the airplane crashed. The wreckage of a Boeing 757 was not found at the Pentagon. Therefore, a Boeing 757 did not crash at the Pentagon. Anyone who can’t understand that is simple-minded.
Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”
He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”
He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
Hear Frederick C. Blackburn explain to Jan Lamprecht why the alleged cell-phone calls were impossible:
archive.org/details/911theimpossiblecellphonecallsotherjewishliescrimes1_202003
A masterful shredding of the System’s 9-11 lies: “9-11: The New Pearl Harbor”
archive.org/details/September11TheNewPearlHarbor
Jan Lamprecht introduces and shows a video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
archive.org/details/911architectsexpertsexplosions1_202002
“Painful Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmid:
archive.org/details/scm-23198-painfuldeceptions-part1of2
archive.org/details/scm-23202-painfuldeceptions-part2of2
The Apollo moon program was also mentioned.
You know more than they know.
You know that, because of the levels of radiation on the moon, the camera that is used must be shielded with lead.
You know that, because of the extremely high levels of radiation in the Van Allen Belts, astronauts passing through them must be protected by a very thick lead shield.
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft lands on the moon, the exhaust will dig a crater and the landing pads will be covered with dust and debris. (“Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”)
You know this about the photographs allegedly taken by astronauts on the moon that show that the surface under the exhaust nozzle of the “lunar lander” is flat and undisturbed and that there is no dirt, dust, or debris on any of the landing pads: those photos actually tend to prove that astronauts didn’t land on the moon.
You know that, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sight of the stars from its surface would be absolutely stunning and breath-taking. (Reporter: “When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars … ?” Neil Armstrong: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface….”)
You know that when you take photographs on the moon, the shadows on the ground will be parallel.
You know that if you’re on the moon photographing the front side of a man and the sun is behind him, the front of the man will not be illuminated.
You know that if a camera is designed to place the largest of the reticles (cross hairs) at the center of the photograph, then the largest reticle will be at the exact center of every photograph taken by that camera.
You know that if a camera is designed to put several cross hairs on each photograph, it would be impossible for one of the cross hairs to be partially obscured by an object in the photograph.
You know that if you drive a golf ball off a tee on the moon, the ball won’t be sliced. (In a vacuum, the ball can’t curve.)
You know that an “astronaut cavorting on the moon” was slyly laughing at us when he proclaimed, “It’s absolutely unreal!”
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft blasts off from the lunar surface, there will be a very large, very visible, opaque exhaust plume.
You know that if you give a rock from the moon to the Dutch prime minister, it won’t turn out to be petrified wood.
You know why the mediocre Saturn V rocket was dumped as soon as the Apollo program ended.
You know why Armstrong turned down $5000 by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon.
You know why ZOG napalmed a radio station’s transmitter that was broadcasting an interview with the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know why Apollo astronaut James Irwin suddenly died just before he was going to talk to the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know more than they.
This may be the most powerful video about Apollo because it contains the best clips from the best videos and interviews about the moon-landing hoax:
The false-flag attack on 2001-09-11 was discussed.
Ted Gunderson (formerly head of the F.B.I. in southern California):
“There’s no question about who was responsible for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Through their informant … (the F.B.I. informant …) they had control of whether or not to place a dummy bomb or a real bomb there. They placed a real bomb, and the reason they did was to pass the anti-terrorism legislation. There were only six people killed—not enough to pass the legislation…. (So then in 1995 we had the Alfred Murrah Building in Oklahoma City—168 people killed—and then a year later they passed the anti-terrorism legislation.) But I’m telling you that the F.B.I. knew about this, they had control of it, and did nothing to stop it….
“He [the informant] told the F.B.I. in advance that they were going to bomb it…. He was given the assignment to put the bomb together. And he went to his supervisor, his F.B.I. supervisor, and he said, ‘We’re going to put a dummy bomb in here, right?’ Then the F.B.I. supervisor said, ‘No, we’re going to put a real bomb.’ …
“Back in … the 1980s, the Department of Justice proposed legislation to ‘fight terrorism’, and this legislation took away many of our constitutional rights and civil liberties. One of the authors, a female attorney with the Department of Justice, publicly … made this statement … that before this passes people will have to be killed….
“That was the reason, I feel, for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing…. And now with the Twin Towers World Trade Center episode [in 2001], our Congress is now proposing further restrictions on our constitutional rights and civil liberties…. And that’s why our intelligence people not only knew about it in advance but probably [were] involved. There’s no question; you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Again:
“you cannot possibly have an operation of this magnitude without our people knowing about it.”
Paul Craig Roberts (americanfreepress.net/911-destroyed-america):
“As there is no doubt whatsoever that Building 7 was wired for demolition, the question is why?”
“Only an uneducated and ignorant public can believe the official 9/11 story. The U.S. population fits this description.”
In May 2002, FEMA released its report on the collapse of the buildings. We read: “The specifics of the fires in Building 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”
Experts who watched videos of the collapse of Building 7 say that the building had definitely been prepared for demolition by professionals.
Silverstein explained why it was decided to “pull” (demolish) Building 7: “I said ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.”
Why had Building 7 already been prepared for demolition? Why was it possible to “pull” the building on the spur of the moment?
The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.)
A flight instructor at the school where he was pretending to learn to fly an airplane said: “I’m still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all.”
The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were nine feet in diameter and largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.
Where an airplane crashes, airplane wreckage is found. When you find the airplane wreckage, you’ve found where the airplane crashed. The wreckage of a Boeing 757 was not found at the Pentagon. Therefore, a Boeing 757 did not crash at the Pentagon. Anyone who can’t understand that is simple-minded.
Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”
He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”
He’s telling us that he’s absolutely certain that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
Hear Frederick C. Blackburn explain to Jan Lamprecht why the alleged cell-phone calls were impossible:
archive.org/details/911theimpossiblecellphonecallsotherjewishliescrimes1_202003
A masterful shredding of the System’s 9-11 lies:
“9-11: The New Pearl Harbor”
archive.org/details/September11TheNewPearlHarbor
Jan Lamprecht introduces and shows a video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
archive.org/details/911architectsexpertsexplosions1_202002
“Painful Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmid:
archive.org/details/scm-23198-painfuldeceptions-part1of2
archive.org/details/scm-23202-painfuldeceptions-part2of2
The Apollo moon program was also mentioned.
You know more than they know.
You know that, because of the levels of radiation on the moon, the camera that is used must be shielded with lead.
You know that, because of the extremely high levels of radiation in the Van Allen Belts, astronauts passing through them must be protected by a very thick lead shield.
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft lands on the moon, the exhaust will dig a crater and the landing pads will be covered with dust and debris. (“Just like Neil, I didn’t dig any crater at all!”)
You know this about the photographs allegedly taken by astronauts on the moon that show that the surface under the exhaust nozzle of the “lunar lander” is flat and undisturbed and that there is no dirt, dust, or debris on any of the landing pads: those photos actually tend to prove that astronauts didn’t land on the moon.
You know that, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sight of the stars from its surface would be absolutely stunning and breath-taking. (Reporter: “When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars … ?” Neil Armstrong: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface….”)
You know that when you take photographs on the moon, the shadows on the ground will be parallel.
You know that if you’re on the moon photographing the front side of a man and the sun is behind him, the front of the man will not be illuminated.
You know that if a camera is designed to place the largest of the reticles (cross hairs) at the center of the photograph, then the largest reticle will be at the exact center of every photograph taken by that camera.
You know that if a camera is designed to put several cross hairs on each photograph, it would be impossible for one of the cross hairs to be partially obscured by an object in the photograph.
You know that if you drive a golf ball off a tee on the moon, the ball won’t be sliced. (In a vacuum, the ball can’t curve.)
You know that an “astronaut cavorting on the moon” was slyly laughing at us when he proclaimed, “It’s absolutely unreal!”
You know that when a rocket-propelled craft blasts off from the lunar surface, there will be a very large, very visible, opaque exhaust plume.
You know that if you give a rock from the moon to the Dutch prime minister, it won’t turn out to be petrified wood.
You know why the mediocre Saturn V rocket was dumped as soon as the Apollo program ended.
You know why Armstrong turned down $5000 by refusing to swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon.
You know why ZOG napalmed a radio station’s transmitter that was broadcasting an interview with the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know why Apollo astronaut James Irwin suddenly died just before he was going to talk to the author of We Never Went to the Moon.
You know more than they.
This may be the most powerful video about Apollo because it contains the best clips from the best videos and interviews about the moon-landing hoax:
http://archive.org/details/Apollo_Moon_Hoax